The former I can cope with, the latter.........not.Did you know Bono has revealed he's a big Abba and BeeGees fan
Quite like both. I'm closet BeeGees fan. Bit of Saturday Night Fever, eh?The former I can cope with, the latter.........not.
I would suggest that is just measuring the speed of their vision system, not how they perceive time. Also, part of the reason small animals can react faster, is just down to their size. Nerve impulses from the brain have far less distance to travel but, travel at about the same speed as in large animals, therefore instructions can arrive at the muscles very much quicker than in large animals.Different animals perceive time differently. I often wondered how animals in slo-mo clips manage to react as quickly as they do, so asked the question of Science Focus a few months ago. By showing animals strobing lights (the pace of which ramps up), their neural activity can be monitored and the point at which they stop detecting the strobing and just see a steady light can be detected. It varies, so many (particularly smaller) creatures are able to 'chop' time up into smaller chunks than we can - in part helping to give reactions that are beyond us.
I suspect 24fps must look pretty rubbish to them...
It can't just be about the eye itself, there's nothing in the physical structure that could impose an arbitrary cutoff related to strobe frequency - the eye just transmits - it must be about how the brain interprets what it receives and therefore becomes about perception, not senses.I would suggest that is just measuring the speed of their vision system, not how they perceive time. Also, part of the reason small animals can react faster, is just down to their size. Nerve impulses from the brain have far less distance to travel but, travel at about the same speed as in large animals, therefore instructions can arrive at the muscles very much quicker than in large animals.
I didn't say it was just about the eye. The vision system includes that part of the brain that receives the information from the eyes and interprets it. I still don't believe the study was testing perception of time, rather the speed at which the vision system can take in, interpret and react to, what the eyes see, not the animal's perception of our arbitrary human concept of time.It can't just be about the eye itself, there's nothing in the physical structure that could impose an arbitrary cutoff related to strobe frequency - the eye just transmits - it must be about how the brain interprets what it receives and therefore becomes about perception, not senses.