Dac Upgrade from Arcam Rdac To Audiolab M DAC

[lewis hurlin]

I am wanting to update my Arcam rDAC to either the Rega DAC or the Adudiolab M DAC . I have an Audiollab 8000a mk2 and a 8000p bi amped linked to a pair of Monitor Audio BR5s . I have a Logitech Squeezbox Duet which I stream FLAC files from a WD NAS drive and also use Spotify Premium What are you thoughts I want something that is a warmer in sound and has more detail than the Arcam

 

[lpv]

Do you really think you'll change sound sig of your system to warmer and more detailed by swaping dac's? :shame:

 

[ID.]

More detail maybe but I wouldn't expect more warmth. I'd look at upgrading your speakers for a significant change.

 

[nima]

I want something that is a warmer in sound and has more detail than the Arcam

Try Rega DAC and Arcam irDAC.

 

[emperor's new clothes]

+1

I home trialed both the MDac and irDAC. You won't find much warmth in the MDac, IMHO. For a significant upgrade, will have a spend much more on something like the Chord Hugo. irDAC excellent VFM.

 

[emperor's new clothes]

PS: irDAC works a treat with the SBT

 

[Covenanter]

A convector heater will provide you with more warmth and will have about as much effect on sound as changing your DAC.

Chris

 

[davedotco]

You have Audiolab amplifiers and are looking for more warmth.......

It's really not that difficult.

Clue, the answer is not more Audiolab.......

 

[Esra]

Dave I would not generalize,though i didn´t like the 8200A (steril and cold) the MB´s and P as amplifiers are very neutral with a tad to the warmer side.

I think the OP could be happy if he tries a M-Dac with his P amp,while i wouldn´t call that combo really warm.

 

[davedotco]

Dave I would not generalize,though i didn´t like the 8200A (steril and cold) the MB´s and P as amplifiers are very neutral with a tad to the warmer side.

I think the OP could be happy if he tries a M-Dac with his P amp,while i wouldn´t call that combo really warm.

You are right in one respect anyway, Audiolab power amps have always been adequate, if hardly inspiring.

The problem has always been with their low level circuitry, pre-amps, Cd players, dacs etc. Other opinions are available, but I have always found them unpleasant due to their dry, 'clinical' presentation.

This is slightly odd for me, as normally I hate any tendency towards fake 'warmth', generally prefering a 'leaner' balance but Audiolab, not for me.

 

[matt49]

You are right in one respect anyway, Audiolab power amps have always been adequate, if hardly inspiring.

The problem has always been with their low level circuitry, pre-amps, Cd players, dacs etc. Other opinions are available, but I have always found them unpleasant due to their dry, 'clinical' presentation.

This is slightly odd for me, as normally I hate any tendency towards fake 'warmth', generally prefering a 'leaner' balance but Audiolab, not for me.

It may be true that Audiolab kit has a "house sound": certainly many people think so. But it's worth noting that the MDAC was a one-off design* for Audiolab by John Westlake, and the general view is that it's quite different, in terms of presentation, from the Audiolab house style.

I also note in passing that John Westlake has a not altogether favourable opinion** of Audiolab amps.

As for the OP's question, I'd agree with those who suggest spending the money on another part of the system. But if a new DAC really does appeal, then the Musical Fidelity V-90 DAC is well regarded and is said to have a smooth balance, and it's only £200.

Another (more expensive) option would be to buy the MDAC and sign up for John Westlake's upgraded version (details on the PFM forum). Among the wizzy functions of the "level 3" MDAC is an integrated DSP engine. That really would give you all the warmth you could possibly want!

Matt

* OK, later followed by the stripped-down QDAC.

** I'm being diplomatic here.

 

[davedotco]

We have spoken about this before, I have not lived with the M-dac so have little real experience, having heard it once or twice I found it unremarkable, with a kind of slightly hazy quality that I have heard elsewhere in Westlake designs.

This may be entirely psycological on my part, all Audiolab product sounds the same to me, ie like an 8000A though I am sure they have improved in recent years I find it hard to get past that.

I shall investigate the revised versions you mention.

 

[matt49]

The "Lakewest" MDAC project is detailed here:

http://mdac2.lakewestaudio.com/

The site is a bit out of date, and the project is already at least 6 months behind schedule.

I had my MDAC upgraded to level 2 "Toy", and I've signed up for the level 3 package. This is a bit fanciful on my part: I'm only using the MDAC as a headphone amp at the moment (which it's exceptionally good at IMO). There are a few things about the project that appeal, and I find JW a very approachable chap with bags of integrity.

:cheers:

Matt

 

[Native_bon]

You are right in one respect anyway, Audiolab power amps have always been adequate, if hardly inspiring.

The problem has always been with their low level circuitry, pre-amps, Cd players, dacs etc. Other opinions are available, but I have always found them unpleasant due to their dry, 'clinical' presentation.

This is slightly odd for me, as normally I hate any tendency towards fake 'warmth', generally prefering a 'leaner' balance but Audiolab, not for me.

It may be true that Audiolab kit has a "house sound": certainly many people think so. But it's worth noting that the MDAC was a one-off design* for Audiolab by John Westlake, and the general view is that it's quite different, in terms of presentation, from the Audiolab house style.

I also note in passing that John Westlake has a not altogether favourable opinion** of Audiolab amps.

As for the OP's question, I'd agree with those who suggest spending the money on another part of the system. But if a new DAC really does appeal, then the Musical Fidelity V-90 DAC is well regarded and is said to have a smooth balance, and it's only £200.

Another (more expensive) option would be to buy the MDAC and sign up for John Westlake's upgraded version (details on the PFM forum). Among the wizzy functions of the "level 3" MDAC is an integrated DSP engine. That really would give you all the warmth you could possibly want!

Matt

* OK, later followed by the stripped-down QDAC.

** I'm being diplomatic here.

I have been using the V90 DAC for 4 months now & i have never looked back. Excellent all round DAC. It expresses details very well & also sound very smooth with it.

 

[lewis hurlin]

Been having a think since last night. and I am going for the Rega DAC and also going to change Audiolabs for a 2nd hand Naim nait 5i italic amplifier which I can do straight away I will use my Marantz CD 63 KI as transport the the Rega DAC and I wwill in the next few months upgrade the speakers looking for something along the lines of the Spenoder A6 line when funds allow . I think thiswill satisfy my needs

 

[rainsoothe]

Have you heard any of that stuff? As far as I understand, the Nait 5i (italic) is rather bright, compared to 5i and 5si at least. Also, Rega Brio not for everyone - you really should listen to it, I thought it was a fuzzy mess when I listened to it, and wondered why it was so hyped

Although I havent heard it, the Arcam iRdac might be what you're looking for, based on what I read and a friend's impressions. Try audition anything you wanna buy, you might end up being disappointed, and there are better ways to lose money

Not saying the Rega Dac sucks btw, it's just that it's not for everyone.