Perhaps its just me, but I find this Chord(ette) product to be frustrating close to being useful but then they deliberately shot themselves in the foot. I love the idea of getting the music off my computer/server with an external DAC, but I'm not buying a serperate £400 DAC just for the computer and then another for everything else because they choose not include traditional digital inputs. Can't understand their thinking here, yes they also released another Chord DAC at the same time that does have those other inputs, but its so much more expensive that its hardly going to appeal to the same people.ÿ
ÿThe review is also a little disappointing. To say that it sounds much better than music straight from the computer is great of course, but to be blunt, so it bloody well should. Its faint praise at best, any external DAC will sound better than one built into a computer. I'm assuming the 5 star review means it sounds fantastic, although I personally don't understand how a product can get a 5 star review with such a deficient input selection, connectivity on a DAC is vital so in my mind its a 4 star product at best assuming it is stunning as far as sound quality. It would of been nice to know how it competes compared to the likes of the CA DacMagic for instance as that also offers USB input. Even my cheapo HeadRoom USB DAC/amp sounds significantly better than my MacBook Pro's internal DAC so again the review gives little to go by. The only novel feature the Chordette has is the bluetooth, but I can't see that being too important to many people buying a £400 external DAC. There again, perhaps I'm way off, to me the recentlyÿannouncedÿCambridge Audio DAC looks much more appealing even if the Chordette had a slight advantage in sound quality as I can also use it for my CD player, connect the Airport Express etc..ÿShame, I would have loved to have a reason and surprisingly the means, to buy something from such a well respected high-end HiFi name