Hi everyone,
Im looking to upgrade the sound system based in my lounge. I currently own a Sony HT-FS1 system. I am now at the point where I would like something more substantial. I dont want the mess of wires so I feel a 2.1 system would suit me best. After much reading I have settled on the KEF r100s coupled with either the KEF r400d or possibly one of the REL R range subwoofers. My main use would be for TV which i have Sky HD, a blue ray player and a PS3, however, i would also like to use it for music from time to time (cds from the blue ray player or airplay). So back to the question in hand, Do I go for the Pioneer SC-LX56 (or the equivilent) or do I go for a stereo amplifier? For arguments sake lets say my budget is £1300.
Thanks in advance for any replys
Im looking to upgrade the sound system based in my lounge. I currently own a Sony HT-FS1 system. I am now at the point where I would like something more substantial. I dont want the mess of wires so I feel a 2.1 system would suit me best. After much reading I have settled on the KEF r100s coupled with either the KEF r400d or possibly one of the REL R range subwoofers. My main use would be for TV which i have Sky HD, a blue ray player and a PS3, however, i would also like to use it for music from time to time (cds from the blue ray player or airplay). So back to the question in hand, Do I go for the Pioneer SC-LX56 (or the equivilent) or do I go for a stereo amplifier? For arguments sake lets say my budget is £1300.
Thanks in advance for any replys