Hello gang,
I came across This product on ebay and my first thought is, "What a con."
Now why would I think that?
I work in commications (currently Openreach) and have done so for the past 43 years.
For about 20 of those years. I worked on leased lines. Point to point data transmission.
I also fiddle about with computers and know a little about computers and data transmission.
What I know:
Data transmitted from point 'A' to point 'B' has to be 100% otherwise we have errors. Corrupted data.
Now there are error correcting protocols. HDB3 which is used on 2Meg links. This basically asks for data to be retransmitted if there are errors. With audio, the protocols tend to guess what comes next.
Point 'A' transmits 1234567890 and point 'B' expects 1234567890
Any other numbers and it's corruption.
Dealing with data/programs.. it's either correct or corrupted.
Send the data again or flag as an error.
What makes an audio switch better than a normal one?
If a normal switch is erroring. The data transmission is going to be slow, but it will get there.
An erroring switch is no good.
Can you imagine all the corrupt data?
Programs failing..
So if a normal switch performs normally. No errors or very few.
What makes an audio switch better at transmitting data?
I get the idea of analogue cables.
Capacitance, inductance and resistance having an effected.
But in digital.
The data is correct or there is an error and if there is an error. Send again.
Are cheap digital cables erroring, but expensive cables are not?
I don't thinks so.
So...
Question.
How are these audio switches and expensive digital cables doing the job better?
Phew...
I came across This product on ebay and my first thought is, "What a con."
Now why would I think that?
I work in commications (currently Openreach) and have done so for the past 43 years.
For about 20 of those years. I worked on leased lines. Point to point data transmission.
I also fiddle about with computers and know a little about computers and data transmission.
What I know:
Data transmitted from point 'A' to point 'B' has to be 100% otherwise we have errors. Corrupted data.
Now there are error correcting protocols. HDB3 which is used on 2Meg links. This basically asks for data to be retransmitted if there are errors. With audio, the protocols tend to guess what comes next.
Point 'A' transmits 1234567890 and point 'B' expects 1234567890
Any other numbers and it's corruption.
Dealing with data/programs.. it's either correct or corrupted.
Send the data again or flag as an error.
What makes an audio switch better than a normal one?
If a normal switch is erroring. The data transmission is going to be slow, but it will get there.
An erroring switch is no good.
Can you imagine all the corrupt data?
Programs failing..
So if a normal switch performs normally. No errors or very few.
What makes an audio switch better at transmitting data?
I get the idea of analogue cables.
Capacitance, inductance and resistance having an effected.
But in digital.
The data is correct or there is an error and if there is an error. Send again.
Are cheap digital cables erroring, but expensive cables are not?
I don't thinks so.
So...
Question.
How are these audio switches and expensive digital cables doing the job better?
Phew...
Last edited by a moderator: