Craig M.:
to be honest pp, it's a while since i heard the db1i's. my recollections of them in comparison to atc are not favourable but that could be entirely down to my taste in sound. i remember a full sounding speaker that was "musical" (whatever that means) and sparkly, sweet treble. however, when ever i compare speakers to atc, i find they sound muffled, stodgy and slow. i think with atc, you are hearing the music not the speakers, if that makes sense.
also, i might as well say that for me the whole "atc are too honest(!)" and will murder poor recordings is a none issue. i think part of it is down to how good a decent recording sounds through them. also, those speakers which somehow make a bad recording more palatable by covering the deficiencies with their own distortion, are also covering up the better recordings with their own distortion.
for me, it took a couple of weeks to adjust to the atc sound (or lack of), now i have i wouldn't change for anything - other speakers almost sound broken in comparison.
he's had flack on here in the past, but if you are seriously considering atc, i recommend talking to rick at musicraft.
he can talk the hind legs off a donkey
, but he really does know his onions when it comes to atc and could explain better then i can what makes then so good.
Thanks Craig - I was hoping to engauge the guys at WHFI. I heard the ATC's at 'The towers' and sounded very impressive. However, the kit on demonstration - Naim aside - is unfamiliar to me - course, the acoustics, also, is a little different to a typical living room. By contrast, the DB1's were tested on my kit and, likewise, sounded very good indeed. That aside, I feel my amp was to blame for the DB1's inability to punch out the lower frequencies.