A polite conversation about the merits of different DAC technologies.

Bespoke FPGA, Ladder Resistors and Chipset DACs really don't sound the same.

Question to ask, do you prefer the vinyl-analogue sounding R2R to the more precise chipset solution such as ESS or AKM or FPGA adoption to give you a more individual sound.

A British Audiophile is certainly sitting more firmly in the R2R camp.

View: https://youtu.be/a-BtA2XPiRU?si=aWkWJif_sTUeK-cM
Vinyl analogue sounding dac?????
 
That's what happens when you plagiarise a YT vloggers quote. 😊
I should rephrase, R2Rs are a little softer around the edges and less clinical than chipset based solutions. 🙂

That said it's widely acknowledged that, both being chipsets, AKM is softer but more spacious than ESS chips. AKM also encouraged Linn to modify the hell out of them, which is possible. They were borderline re-engineered by Linn. This has not been done with either chipset by any other company I know. Linn still uses AKM in their lesser models.

R2R in its purest form seems to be rare though, as pure R2R by design cannot upsample, so many so called R2Rs are hybrids. So again, if it sounds better is it due to the topology or engineering?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jasonovich

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts