jamescfyfe said:
Thanks for the reply, yeah I'm really not sure what I don't like but I'm just not happy a pathetic but also quite major thing is how ugly the 684 is and they are just so big with tiny drive units, I just feel they really have to work hard for moderate sound and it sounds forced not nice smooth and precise. The 685 was great just lake bass and again it felt like they would struggle to fill the room. My sources are yes mainly CD player it also has an iPod usb connection I use for Apple lossless quality music and also for quick and easy not bothering about quality I use Apple TV through the optical input for AirPlay music through spirit for example.
Ok, that would pretty much rule out the Croft which will be too basic but you could add the Nad D7050 to the list instead.
First thing I would look at would be the Peachtree, see if the functionality would work for you, it has a full asyncronous usb input rather than the simpler iPod style input, that may be an issue for you.
With all the different ways now available to play music functionality is becoming increasingly important, the Nad has great functionality but is not particularly powerful in conventional terms. However the amplifier is fully digital, so it's capabilities might surprise you. I would love to try the D7050 with a pair of Q Acoustics Concept 40s, never had the opportunity.
You need to think what you really want, a bigger Marantz or Rotel amplifier with better B&Ws is a 'conventional' solution, there are plenty of others. Personally I think you can do better, but it means searching out less well known equipment and trusting your own decision making capabilities rather than conventional wisdom. Up to you.