An update on this thread http://community.whathifi.com/forums/t/464197.aspx
I thought I'd start a new thread, rather than just adding on to the original, as what happened raises some questions.
So, John Lewis delivered a replacement Sony 46EX503 this week (top marks to them) and I'm pleased to say that it works, that is to say it works in accordance to all the reviews that have been written for the 46EX503 so far, it is a cracking good picture, and if you are lucky to get one that works first time, then you will not be disappointed. This proves that the first set was indeed faulty "out of the box".
So to some questions/discussion points. I am really disappointed that a Sony product failed straight out of the box, and reading this and other forums, especially in relation to TV's, it seems that I was not alone in this happening lately. Is Sony quality not what it used to be ? This will be the 6th (I think) sony TV that I have purchased and the first that has failed out the box, and it has left a bit of a sour taste, especially as I have a hunch that it was probably shipped in that state from the factory. I have some experience of this (electronic manufacturing in "low cost regions") and when we moved a manufacturing plant from the UK to a low cost region the out of the box fail rate doubled, as did the annual fail rate. It took a lot of hard work to get it back down.
Is it as good as the 40W5810 that I still have ? Hmmm, good question, and I'm not too sure if I can answer yes yet. Of course it is larger (46 as opposed to 40) and that may be tricking the eye, but I have the luxury of being able to do a side by side comparison, and the jury is out at the moment.
Now to a question to the What Hi-Fi folks, and one that I know has been asked many many times before, but hey, I'm a newbie here, so cut me some slack ..... I've now set up the 46EX503 with what my eye thinks is a reasonable picture, with the aid of the THX calibration stuff that appears on some discs, and my wife, and my son but what I'd really like to know is what the reviewers used as their review settings ? Did the reviewers actualy record the settings, or is there some other reason that review sample calibration, or picture, settings are not divulged ? I ask this as it would be a good starting point to get going for us. It may also be interesting to see how far away others are from the review settings (bearing in mind that the human eye varies from individual to indiviual).
Anyway, I'm now a happy bunny, for the time being at least
I thought I'd start a new thread, rather than just adding on to the original, as what happened raises some questions.
So, John Lewis delivered a replacement Sony 46EX503 this week (top marks to them) and I'm pleased to say that it works, that is to say it works in accordance to all the reviews that have been written for the 46EX503 so far, it is a cracking good picture, and if you are lucky to get one that works first time, then you will not be disappointed. This proves that the first set was indeed faulty "out of the box".
So to some questions/discussion points. I am really disappointed that a Sony product failed straight out of the box, and reading this and other forums, especially in relation to TV's, it seems that I was not alone in this happening lately. Is Sony quality not what it used to be ? This will be the 6th (I think) sony TV that I have purchased and the first that has failed out the box, and it has left a bit of a sour taste, especially as I have a hunch that it was probably shipped in that state from the factory. I have some experience of this (electronic manufacturing in "low cost regions") and when we moved a manufacturing plant from the UK to a low cost region the out of the box fail rate doubled, as did the annual fail rate. It took a lot of hard work to get it back down.
Is it as good as the 40W5810 that I still have ? Hmmm, good question, and I'm not too sure if I can answer yes yet. Of course it is larger (46 as opposed to 40) and that may be tricking the eye, but I have the luxury of being able to do a side by side comparison, and the jury is out at the moment.
Now to a question to the What Hi-Fi folks, and one that I know has been asked many many times before, but hey, I'm a newbie here, so cut me some slack ..... I've now set up the 46EX503 with what my eye thinks is a reasonable picture, with the aid of the THX calibration stuff that appears on some discs, and my wife, and my son but what I'd really like to know is what the reviewers used as their review settings ? Did the reviewers actualy record the settings, or is there some other reason that review sample calibration, or picture, settings are not divulged ? I ask this as it would be a good starting point to get going for us. It may also be interesting to see how far away others are from the review settings (bearing in mind that the human eye varies from individual to indiviual).
Anyway, I'm now a happy bunny, for the time being at least