B Big Chris New member Apr 3, 2008 400 0 0 Aug 26, 2010 #1 In the review it says £2500, but earlier in the mag when listed as an alternative to a LG 47LX9900 TV, it says £2750. Which one's right?
In the review it says £2500, but earlier in the mag when listed as an alternative to a LG 47LX9900 TV, it says £2750. Which one's right?
C Clare Newsome New member Jun 4, 2007 1,657 0 0 Aug 26, 2010 #2 It's both - £2500 for the set; an extra £250 for the transmitter/glasses bundle to make it 3D, and therefore a direct rival to the LG as reviewed. The additional pricing for the 3D bits and pieces is also mentioned in the Sony review.
It's both - £2500 for the set; an extra £250 for the transmitter/glasses bundle to make it 3D, and therefore a direct rival to the LG as reviewed. The additional pricing for the 3D bits and pieces is also mentioned in the Sony review.