I'm living in the Netherlands and here in my area i can not buy WHF. Has WHF the Kef R300 test and can somebody give me the testresult? Thanks!
loneranger said:I'm living in the Netherlands and here in my area i can not buy WHF. Has WHF the Kef R300 test and can somebody give me the testresult? Thanks!
It might be on the warm side...but only you can decide if you like the end result.loneranger said:?
Yes, i know but can not changes that. Thats why i'am looking at a speaker with pleasant highes. But also not dull or boring.
But is my amp nad c356 a good match for the r300?
loneranger said:I'm living in the Netherlands and here in my area i can not buy WHF. Has WHF the Kef R300 test and can somebody give me the testresult? Thanks!
CnoEvil said:IMO. Tannoy pairs well with amps like Arcam, Sugden, Electrcompaniet, Croft and Pathos...which stops edginess creeping in.
R300s, not only need space, but an amp that can keep the bass in check....which usually means spending in the £1500 to £2500 range....Rega, Arcam, Creek, Hegel.
loneranger said:Maybe it is better to look at the b&w 684s2 and the 685s2. There is a dealer in my area so i can listen.
I also think these speakers are worth the extra effort to get "right".Freddy58 said:Are you not able to audition the R300's? I have these speakers, and am very happy with them. I agree about the positioning, but in the right place and with an amp with control, they display a great sense of scale with no hint of listening fatigue, unlike the MA GX100's that I compared them with in a home demo.
CnoEvil said:I also think these speakers are worth the extra effort to get "right".Freddy58 said:Are you not able to audition the R300's? I have these speakers, and am very happy with them. I agree about the positioning, but in the right place and with an amp with control, they display a great sense of scale with no hint of listening fatigue, unlike the MA GX100's that I compared them with in a home demo.
It is very easy for a bright sound to come across as more detailed, when all it's doing is putting extra emphasis on the treble region.Freddy58 said:Well put. When I set out to buy some speakers, I tried quite a few and narrowed it down to the aforementioned. Of course, it would have been nice to home demo lots more, but not really practical. Of course, everyone's ears/expectations/likes are different, but to be honest, I found lots of speakers sounded very ordinary, even some floor standers didn't have the scale/weight of the R300's. I suppose if I'm honest, I would like to have gone for the GX 100's, wonderfully revealing speakers, but to me, their strength became their weakness after 20 minutes of listening, very fatiguing. Quite some years ago, I had some Kef Concorde IV's which had 8" drivers, and whilst I'm not going to say that the R300's can compare equally in the scale department, they're not that far away, imo. Quite something really.
CnoEvil said:It is very easy for a bright sound to come across as more detailed, when all it's doing is putting extra emphasis on the treble region.Freddy58 said:Well put. When I set out to buy some speakers, I tried quite a few and narrowed it down to the aforementioned. Of course, it would have been nice to home demo lots more, but not really practical. Of course, everyone's ears/expectations/likes are different, but to be honest, I found lots of speakers sounded very ordinary, even some floor standers didn't have the scale/weight of the R300's. I suppose if I'm honest, I would like to have gone for the GX 100's, wonderfully revealing speakers, but to me, their strength became their weakness after 20 minutes of listening, very fatiguing. Quite some years ago, I had some Kef Concorde IV's which had 8" drivers, and whilst I'm not going to say that the R300's can compare equally in the scale department, they're not that far away, imo. Quite something really.
I have generally found that detail comes from the Source...and then a good quality, low distortion amp is then required to pass on that signal as cleanly as possible.
IME. The Tannoys sound leaner than the Kefs, so may well need less space.loneranger said:?
Do the kef r300 need more space than the Tannoy? And i am the onlyone who found the Tannoy on the bright side? I also heard Monitor Audio silver. Horrible highes!
loneranger said:It will be a compromise, especially with my music. On which speaker sounds rock and metal the best. I think better a little dull than bright highes which isn't listenable for me.
IMO. You should probably get the R300s and budget for a better amp at some time in the future. They will need solid, partly filled stands, to help get the best from them. You can always use the Part Bungs if necessary.loneranger said:?
It will be a compromise, especially with my music. On which speaker sounds rock and metal the best. I think better a little dull than bright highes which isn't listenable for me.