I've been putting off a TV purchase for a while now. 4K is here! Whoo-HOooOOOOOooo!! etc.
But, like with Full HD (which is what they called HD before the marketing bods realised that having 5 categories of HD confused people), I had the telly ages before the content arrived. Basically, there's no real benefit in switching to 4K yet - the content isn't there in sufficient quantity.
OLED - now that's interesting. LG is doing it, but...
I want my next screen to be Samsung or Panasonic or (at distant 3rd) Sony.
None of these manufacturers is throwing their considerable balance sheets into OLED in a meaningful way.
Is this a case of "flog the LCD pony" to get people into early 4K cheaply, wait for LG to trailblaze OLED (and drive down development costs) and then for Samsung etc. to jump in (encouraging the early LCD 4K people to buy another TV in 2 years time) or are they just passing the tech by?
I don't want a LCD 4K TV, if 18 months will see the OLED come to the fore.
What do people think (PS - I don't want to spend more than £1.5K on a 50" screen!).
But, like with Full HD (which is what they called HD before the marketing bods realised that having 5 categories of HD confused people), I had the telly ages before the content arrived. Basically, there's no real benefit in switching to 4K yet - the content isn't there in sufficient quantity.
OLED - now that's interesting. LG is doing it, but...
I want my next screen to be Samsung or Panasonic or (at distant 3rd) Sony.
None of these manufacturers is throwing their considerable balance sheets into OLED in a meaningful way.
Is this a case of "flog the LCD pony" to get people into early 4K cheaply, wait for LG to trailblaze OLED (and drive down development costs) and then for Samsung etc. to jump in (encouraging the early LCD 4K people to buy another TV in 2 years time) or are they just passing the tech by?
I don't want a LCD 4K TV, if 18 months will see the OLED come to the fore.
What do people think (PS - I don't want to spend more than £1.5K on a 50" screen!).