OLED Prices

As people don't tend to change their sets that frequently, I doubt many people have proper back to backs of sets over that period. Personally I'd be surprised of the differences were anything other than incremental - but how that adds up over four model years I don't know.

Mine was a 'last year's model' from RS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DougK1 and Gray

Gray

Well-known member
how much will they improve going forward 4 Years ?
I suppose manufacturers and many consumers would consider expanded smart functions to be an improvement.
I don't.
Picture quality is already better (in some cases a lot better) than what gets broadcasted to them.

The good news is that unlike with so much else, TV set inflation seems to work in reverse....years later you've effectively been getting better for less (as you've found - and good luck to you 👍).
 

nopiano

Well-known member
We did similar a couple of years ago , with a 2021 model year LG. I think it is ‘Which?’ magazine who recommended looking at previous year models quite a while ago. As mentioned above, the changes are minor, year to year. As you found, the savings are huge.

The LG it replaced was made in 2011, and I recently gave that to a relative. It only needed a Chromecast stick to access the latest ‘smarts’, and otherwise it still looked v good. Not as super crisp or poppingly bright as the newer one, but very watchable with careful setting of picture levels.
 

flashgordon1952

Well-known member
Dec 16, 2019
397
51
4,970
but not on BBC SKY ITV CH4 CH5 and most of the Sky Network The real channels sir. plus 90% of all DVDs Almost all i think not my friend 8K you have to be joking only Japan
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gray

hifi

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2023
453
167
1,070
Let see if the new range drops to half price after a year not that i will be buying another 1 for a good few years and am very happy with the picture.Will can they improve the picture?
 
Last edited:

Gray

Well-known member
None of my TVs are 4k, which is no loss as at least 99% of what I watch isn't 4k.
(BBC regions have only just gone 'HD' although some of that looks upscaled to me - probably using their original equipment).
 

flashgordon1952

Well-known member
Dec 16, 2019
397
51
4,970
iPlayer does a lot in 4k/HDR and it looks great, and many films can now be bought in 4k. No-one mentioned 8k. ITV a 'real' channel? Only in the sense that it exists...
yes a prpoer real channel been transmitting since the 60s unlike those internet channels only been transmitting (actually they dont transmit they are internet ) like the BBC1 .2 real channels
 
  • Like
Reactions: Al ears

flashgordon1952

Well-known member
Dec 16, 2019
397
51
4,970
yes a prpoer real channel been transmitting since the 60s unlike those internet channels only been transmitting (actually they dont transmit they are internet ) like the BBC1 .2 real channels
The BBC did try 3D transmission during the London Olympics it was a disaster try 3D never worked except on games Who transmit on 3D these days ??
 
yes a prpoer real channel been transmitting since the 60s unlike those internet channels only been transmitting (actually they dont transmit they are internet ) like the BBC1 .2 real channels
I was referring to its content, which is (putting it politely) pretty lowbrow. No-one mentioned 3D, and unless you have an old TV it's not an option anyway.

4K isn't going away though, and watching sporting events and documentaries on iPlayer in 4k is transformative.
 

flashgordon1952

Well-known member
Dec 16, 2019
397
51
4,970
i compared my latest buy a Sony 10 year old against the 2023 TCL and surprise the only difference in quality of screen was on Amazon and Netflix on Sky generally it was exactly the same picture , note the audio on Sky on the Sony was slightly better. both using standard speakers ,fitted as sold . Only reason i got rid of the 2011 3D Panasonic Plasma 50 inch was the amount of money it cost to run it . (nice in the winter to warm up the room) nothing to do with the picture or the sounds coming out . So makes me think the only reason i need to replace my TV is when it goes wrong. (the Panasonic never did and still doing sterling service )
So all this thing about the latest wonder product from LG Sony Samsung etc etc makes me go cold . Why keep changing my TV for the sake of it ?? ( note have a collection of 600 DVDs some BluRays . even some VHS tapes ,which are collectable Michael Jackson ones and Star Trek (they never get played as the boxes are signed . by the original casting members of Star Trek and Next Generation . Won at two auctions online. I do understand why people change the TVs probably for the same reason why they keep changing new cars every 2/3 years . They want the latest gadgets on them or simply want to keep up with the Jones family next door and there new TV or new Electric car they just bought
 
There's no logic to what you are saying. Just because you see no difference between an old set and new cheapo TV doesn't mean that a good one wouldn't be a marked step up - it would be. If you want to believe that plasma is still the best screen tech (which you seem to) then go right ahead, but I'm afraid you'd be deluding yourself.
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts