Hi peeps, I am new here.
Back in 1990/1 (can't remember which year now) - I bought a pair of Rogers LS6a's and an Arcam Delta 60. Back then I thought it was the best thing I'd ever heard. My Dad had a pair of Linn Sara's - which he was running through a Linn Amp, and when we tried the Rogers on that also - the compairson between them and the Sara's left us susprised to find the Rogers were a better sounding speaker, by quite a strech. But recently, the Rogers blew after 22 years or so useage... and instead of getting them repaired (altough I still have them) - I started out again.
I bought myself a pair of B&W CM10's, along with a second hand Linn Klout and Kairn (later models). The only thing I haven't upgraded yet is a CD player. I've put down the deposit on a Naim CD5XS, which I'll get in February - but with the CM10's and Linn amps, I'm currently using an old Philips CD610.
Thing is, I expected to be blown away with the CM10's and klout and Kairn - It's certainly a powerful sound, punchy as hell too. But I'm not as impressed with it as the Roger's LS6a's - which sounded a LOT more natural, plus the sound didn't sound like it was coming out of the speakers as much as it does with this new setup (I'm curious as to if the CD player upgrade will make that much difference).
But also now, I am thinking that my best move might be to get those Rogers speakers repaired (as the cainets are still in good condition) and use them with the Klout and Kairn, plus the Naim cd player, when I get it. As I just can't imagine the Naim will make that much difference.
Does it sound crazy that those Rogers could sound better than the CM10s? And/or could the Naim CD5XS make that much difference?
Back in 1990/1 (can't remember which year now) - I bought a pair of Rogers LS6a's and an Arcam Delta 60. Back then I thought it was the best thing I'd ever heard. My Dad had a pair of Linn Sara's - which he was running through a Linn Amp, and when we tried the Rogers on that also - the compairson between them and the Sara's left us susprised to find the Rogers were a better sounding speaker, by quite a strech. But recently, the Rogers blew after 22 years or so useage... and instead of getting them repaired (altough I still have them) - I started out again.
I bought myself a pair of B&W CM10's, along with a second hand Linn Klout and Kairn (later models). The only thing I haven't upgraded yet is a CD player. I've put down the deposit on a Naim CD5XS, which I'll get in February - but with the CM10's and Linn amps, I'm currently using an old Philips CD610.
Thing is, I expected to be blown away with the CM10's and klout and Kairn - It's certainly a powerful sound, punchy as hell too. But I'm not as impressed with it as the Roger's LS6a's - which sounded a LOT more natural, plus the sound didn't sound like it was coming out of the speakers as much as it does with this new setup (I'm curious as to if the CD player upgrade will make that much difference).
But also now, I am thinking that my best move might be to get those Rogers speakers repaired (as the cainets are still in good condition) and use them with the Klout and Kairn, plus the Naim cd player, when I get it. As I just can't imagine the Naim will make that much difference.
Does it sound crazy that those Rogers could sound better than the CM10s? And/or could the Naim CD5XS make that much difference?