I hope that's what the article writer and What Hi-Fi editorial staff are doing. It's a common complaint. How do you make sure it "fits your needs"? My needs are a flat TV with integral great Atmos surround system. They don't make them, unless you can afford an ultra-premium Philips B&W, B&O, or similar. The tape measure is irrelevant. Many of these sets a virtually flush with the surface they are sat on. Nobody makes pancake flat soundbars that sound any good. I can forgive the TV manufacturers rubbish sound; their panel technology has moved on and we prefer slim profile TVs rather than the (good sounding) monster CRT boxes of old. I would be happy if they just sold monitors without sound at all, as long as they acknowledge the practicalities of adding a sound system. Before Atmos became a thing, you might get away sliding a soundbar on the shelf, but that's impractical with upward drivers. It's notable that soundbar manufacturers at least make an effort, they attempt low profile designs, with varying success, and most will provide wall brackets or a simple slots for screw fixing. If you are not wall mounting though, you are stuffed. As I said, My Samsung is screen bottom edge is only 8 cm above the table top. That's a pretty slim list of good sounding Atmos soundbars that can fit under there. For even worse designs, see just about every TV model with those stupid sticking out feet a mile apart. Those screens virtually brush the surface of anything they are sat on. It would absolutely be useful if What Hi Fi and other reviewers published lowest screen heights for TVs. I've been right through the specifications on the Samsung website and it tells you nothing about this. It is faddish design that they are following without recognising practical needs. You can Google search TV stand for soundbar, it's an actual category on some websites! All because TV manufacturers ignore customers and won't design a stand that can adjust in height a few centimetres.