G Gray Well-known member Nov 27, 2015 7,814 8,322 54,070 Dec 7, 2020 #1 I read reviews in every (UK) hi-magazine. Part way through reading this one though, I had to double-check that I was still on the WHF website. Far more personal and detailed, very much at odds with the usual WHF style. What's going on?
I read reviews in every (UK) hi-magazine. Part way through reading this one though, I had to double-check that I was still on the WHF website. Far more personal and detailed, very much at odds with the usual WHF style. What's going on?
Tonestar1 Well-known member Nov 4, 2008 239 97 18,870 Dec 7, 2020 #2 Its a review from the Australian version of the magazine. The reviews seem to be a lot more in depth, personally I prefer them. Reactions: nopiano, Deleted member 108165 and Gray
Its a review from the Australian version of the magazine. The reviews seem to be a lot more in depth, personally I prefer them.
G Gray Well-known member Nov 27, 2015 7,814 8,322 54,070 Dec 8, 2020 #3 Tonestar1 said: Its a review from the Australian version of the magazine. The reviews seem to be a lot more in depth, personally I prefer them. Click to expand... Thanks Tone, that explains it. I prefer it that way too.
Tonestar1 said: Its a review from the Australian version of the magazine. The reviews seem to be a lot more in depth, personally I prefer them. Click to expand... Thanks Tone, that explains it. I prefer it that way too.