I wonder what people think of the Lexicon player?
Beeing an Oppo in disguise it's pricing seem very high, don't you think?
Beeing an Oppo in disguise it's pricing seem very high, don't you think?
-
Direct messages between forum members have now been disabled. - Get all the details here.
Lexicon BD-30 Blu-ray Player
- Thread starter admin_exported
- Start date
deckarep:
I wonder what people think of the Lexicon player?
Beeing an Oppo in disguise it's pricing seem very high, don't you think?
Yes, but not everybody does.
http://community.whathifi.com/forums/post/370308.aspx
I wonder what people think of the Lexicon player?
Beeing an Oppo in disguise it's pricing seem very high, don't you think?
Yes, but not everybody does.
http://community.whathifi.com/forums/post/370308.aspx
Frank Harvey
Well-known member
- Jun 27, 2008
- 567
- 1
- 18,890
I have been following this on the web and I don't think there is any new information. The various participants on the previous thread have their opinions and are unlikely to have changed their minds about this, so unless new evidence appears, I am not sure what there is to discuss.
well its not something i know much about , but doesnt trading standards try to ensure something does what it says on the tin ?? or at least something should contain what it says on the tin (please forgive the coincidental in the tin pun) ??
i mean , say a company took my tv , panny 46g10 , put a new frame around it but changed nothing else , claimed it had certain enhancements , extras , improved performance , not over a stock g10 , but over other tvs , and then put it on sale for 7 times the usual g10 price ....
would this be of interest to trading standards ?? would it be legal ?? im not trying to be smart here , just wondering what the protocol is .....
i mean , say a company took my tv , panny 46g10 , put a new frame around it but changed nothing else , claimed it had certain enhancements , extras , improved performance , not over a stock g10 , but over other tvs , and then put it on sale for 7 times the usual g10 price ....
would this be of interest to trading standards ?? would it be legal ?? im not trying to be smart here , just wondering what the protocol is .....
It would require someone to make a complaint to their local trading standards office, which I guess would then investigate.
But I guess they'd need more evidence to do so than 'I read it on the internet'. And possibly a better source of assessment than a site with a vested interest in selling Oppo players might be required.
But I guess they'd need more evidence to do so than 'I read it on the internet'. And possibly a better source of assessment than a site with a vested interest in selling Oppo players might be required.
interesting , the thing with a.v. is , improvements can be so small , and can be hard to determine , measure ..
anyway , im going to email trading standards a link to the lexicon review , asking them to investigate , just to see what happens , ill keep everyone posted
anyway , im going to email trading standards a link to the lexicon review , asking them to investigate , just to see what happens , ill keep everyone posted
Have fun. Make sure you point out that the source of the review is also a retailer with an interest in selling Oppo players...
Andrew Everard:
It would require someone to make a complaint to their local trading standards office, which I guess would then investigate.
But I guess they'd need more evidence to do so than 'I read it on the internet'. And possibly a better source of assessment than a site with a vested interest in selling Oppo players might be required.
but if that site has a vested interest in oppo players , wouldnt it be counter productive to help scupper the sale of many oppos to lexicon ???
It would require someone to make a complaint to their local trading standards office, which I guess would then investigate.
But I guess they'd need more evidence to do so than 'I read it on the internet'. And possibly a better source of assessment than a site with a vested interest in selling Oppo players might be required.
but if that site has a vested interest in oppo players , wouldnt it be counter productive to help scupper the sale of many oppos to lexicon ???
Or suggest that if you were thinking of buying a $3000+ Lexicon, you might as well buy one of our $500 Oppos, because it's exactly the same...
I don't think even the twisted logic of that site extends to making money from the kits of parts, or maybe even whole players, Oppo sells to Lexicon.
I don't think even the twisted logic of that site extends to making money from the kits of parts, or maybe even whole players, Oppo sells to Lexicon.
yes i will make it clear that the review site does sell the oppos , is it ok to post my email correspondence with trading standards on here ??
If it keeps you happy, feel free. But please make trading standards fully aware of your intention to publish any correspondence you may have.
ok , ill email them , and see where it goes , ill then post my findings on here , in my own words , not posting their emails direct , i wont mention whfi , as its quite obviously nothing to do with them .....
No, don't do that: if you're going to quote them, do so directly, making sure they are aware that they are going to be - oh, I really can't be bothered.
Do what you want and we'll just moderate anything that's legally dodgy...
Do what you want and we'll just moderate anything that's legally dodgy...
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
Does anyone here have Klipsch the Fives, Sevens or Nines? You like them?
- Latest: Deliriumbassist
-
-
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram