Hi guys, new member here *wave*
I've had an interest in AV equipment for a while but I've only ever kept it to a passing interest and the funds haven't allowed me to get in depth with it, sound and vision seems to be an expensive hobby!
Anyway, I have read about Pioneer pulling out of the plasma market and as it happens I'm in the market for a new TV, so I have been looking at the Kuro 5090.
All the reviews I have looked at have been from around a year ago when it seems to have been billed as the best thing EVER...but we are almost a year of improved technology down the line...my question is for a top quality TV is the Kuro 5090 still the best thing I can buy (picture quality wise), or do the improvements made by the competition to their new ranges in the last year, mean that the quality difference is small and perhaps the extra outlay won't be worthwhile?
I can't find any review comparing the 5090 with newer models so I can't get an accurate opinion...any thoughts would be most welcome!
Many thanks
I've had an interest in AV equipment for a while but I've only ever kept it to a passing interest and the funds haven't allowed me to get in depth with it, sound and vision seems to be an expensive hobby!
Anyway, I have read about Pioneer pulling out of the plasma market and as it happens I'm in the market for a new TV, so I have been looking at the Kuro 5090.
All the reviews I have looked at have been from around a year ago when it seems to have been billed as the best thing EVER...but we are almost a year of improved technology down the line...my question is for a top quality TV is the Kuro 5090 still the best thing I can buy (picture quality wise), or do the improvements made by the competition to their new ranges in the last year, mean that the quality difference is small and perhaps the extra outlay won't be worthwhile?
I can't find any review comparing the 5090 with newer models so I can't get an accurate opinion...any thoughts would be most welcome!
Many thanks