CribGoch said:Thanks, guys. What will buying a £1500 amp give me over something like a £500 Rega Brio?
Al ears said:I pretty much agree with what plastic penguin says.
If you were thinking of spending out for a Elicit R I would be sure to audition the Creek 50A as well as it should, in my opinion, compliment the rest of your system nicely.
PS: Love the name tag (very scary)
Al ears said:I pretty much agree with what plastic penguin says.
If you were thinking of spending out for a Elicit R I would be sure to audition the Creek 50A as well as it should, in my opinion, compliment the rest of your system nicely.
PS: Love the name tag (very scary)
CnoEvil said:This is a slightly off the wall suggestion, but if I had around £1600 to spend, I would consider selling the Q35s and looking at a Croft integrated (without phono - £850) with Kef LS50s (£800). IMO. This would be a big upgrade.
Sam Tellig (Stereophile) wrote: "The Croft Phono Integrated amplifier and KEF LS50 loudspeaker made a spectacular combination in my listening room. I welcomed the Croft's warmth, immediacy, and tonality. Once again, Sam's maxim is proved: You can have excellent hi-fi for very little money; you just can't have a lot of it."
Please ignore if you don't want to consider this, but I like to come up with interesting suggestions that might not otherwise have been considered.
CribGoch said:Al ears said:I pretty much agree with what plastic penguin says.
If you were thinking of spending out for a Elicit R I would be sure to audition the Creek 50A as well as it should, in my opinion, compliment the rest of your system nicely.
PS: Love the name tag (very scary)
Thanks! The tag name means a lot to me. I took my then fiancee along Crib Goch back in 1988. She was petrified and I was not flavour of the month! She still married me,though.
Vladimir said:More expensive hi-fi integrated amps tend to be bright, high gain and chuck out all of their power early on the volume dial. Some say manufacturers do this because older gents can afford them, they prefer brighter sound due to hearing loss and tend to be conservative on the volume dial (if an amp is +3db early on its a winner in someones book).
Of course this could be absolutely wrong.
Vladimir said:TrevC said:It could, and is!
Or is it?
Vladimir said:TrevC said:It could, and is!
Or is it?
CribGoch said:Do I really need to spend £1500 on an amp? How much better would it be than something like the Creek for half the cost?
Al ears said:Do you need to spend £1500? I would say no but I think this figure came from you mentioning the Elicit R.
Personally spending about £800 should get you a very decent amp (the Creek 50A for example) but as someone else stated the Q35's could easily be improved on. (I did own a pair once but not for very long I must admit.)
How much better would a £1500 amp be? Only you can answer that one. It should, in theory, be better but these days it seems a lot more is spent on the looks of the actual enclosure rather than the quality of the enclosed electronics.
Al ears said:Do you need to spend £1500? I would say no but I think this figure came from you mentioning the Elicit R.
Personally spending about £800 should get you a very decent amp (the Creek 50A for example) but as someone else stated the Q35's could easily be improved on. (I did own a pair once but not for very long I must admit.)
How much better would a £1500 amp be? Only you can answer that one. It should, in theory, be better but these days it seems a lot more is spent on the looks of the actual enclosure rather than the quality of the enclosed electronics.