All DACs sound the same...

nima

New member
Jan 15, 2014
29
0
0
Visit site
So... as we all know all DACs sound the same... but some must sound more the same as the others.

So what's the cheapest DAC that sounds the same as let's say Rega DAC? And at the same time doesn't sound the same as the DAC in my Fiio X3 (which IIRC uses the same DAC chip)?

It would have to have optical and coaxial SPDIF input. USB not necessary.

P.S. Is there a DAC that sounds the same as Chord Hugo? Which one and how much?

... Naim DAC V1 ... same question - is there a chinese mini box out there that sounds the same for pocket money. Please...
 

Gazzip

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2011
88
2
18,540
Visit site
Put an Audio Research DAC8 up against a Chord Electronics QBD76 and I can guarantee that you would not consider any longer that all DACs sound the same. Chalk and cheese. Completely different sound.
 

nima

New member
Jan 15, 2014
29
0
0
Visit site
I'm on a budget here, so I'm seriously asking which DACs sound the same as the ones I or Gazzip mentioned. - But at the same time sound significantly better than Fiio X3.

It will be used with those cables that sound the same and a competent amplifier that is operating within its limits and must also sounds the same into a pair of BBC-inspired speakers.
 
A

Anderson

Guest
Most DACs sound the same, there can be differences, some use different filters, some allow user selection of multiple filters. The D to A conversion as you say is usually done by 1 or 2 chip fabricators (I'm sure you know the names) as a result, before being filtered or amplified they probably do sound the same.

None of what I've typed has probably helped.
 

MickyBlue

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2013
28
0
18,540
Visit site
if as you say they all sound the same why ask the question?

just buy the cheapest old bit of tat you can get your hands on, its bound to sound the same as a thousand pound plus dac *dash1*
 

Gazzip

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2011
88
2
18,540
Visit site
SteveR750 said:
They don't all sound the same, just that the differences are small / ££ ratio.

That said a QBD76 is in another dimension.

It is in another dimension but it is also an acquired taste. I found it to be an all out assault on the ears leaving no stone unturned. Accurate? Maybe. Revealing? Definitely. Musical? Possibly but I did not think so. It just throws absolutely everything that is there at you which was a bit much for me.
 
A

Anderson

Guest
Chips are cheap as....... The D / A conversion is the cheapest part of the process, it's everything that comes after that adds up if the manufacturer is so inclined.
 

SteveR750

Well-known member
iQ Speakers said:
As usual when talking about DAC's we forget that the implementation of the A in DAC analog is the difficult expensive side.

Absolutely.

I heard the QBD cvonnected to a Roksan K2 driving some MA Golds. It was stright after we had got to a Cyrus pre / mono bloc power plus separate PSU for each box (circa £7.5k IIRC). The Chord + K2 sounded better to me, on that day in that room / those speaksers etc. I ended up buying the Caspian that afternoon.

Back to the OP, I'm listeining to spotify web player on a laptop in a hotel room this evening. I have 3 DACc to choose from: the one in my laptop (a Vaio Pro13, A realtek probably), a Beyerdynamic A200p and the cheap as chipsets dacmagic XS. Listenig with a pair of Klipsch x11i it's obvious between the PC and theother two, and there is still an easily distinguishable difference between the other two. My personal preference is for the XS, it's extrememly good sounding, and better still for being so relatively cheap.
 
A

Anderson

Guest
@steve do you think the difference you're hearing is due to the output stage from the laptop rather than the laptops DAC being of poor quality?
 

steve_1979

Well-known member
Jul 14, 2010
231
10
18,795
Visit site
DAC's can sound different. Here's why:

Some DAC's give off more RF interference than others and some amplifiers are more immune to this RF interference than others which is why differences can sometimes be heard. Some DAC's are badly designed or are deliberately made to sound different with the use of filters.

So... A more accurate way of putting it is that all compentently designed DAC's that are audiably transparent (even the very cheap ones) will sound the same. An amplifiers immunity to RF interference is also a factor when partnered a badly designed DAC that gives of an excessive amount of RF interference.
 

nima

New member
Jan 15, 2014
29
0
0
Visit site
steve_1979 said:
DAC's can sound different. Here's why:

Some DAC's give off more RF interference than others and some amplifiers are more immune to this RF interference than others which is why differences can sometimes be heard. Some DAC's are badly designed or are deliberately made to sound different with the use of filters.

So... A more accurate way of putting it is that all compentently designed DAC's that are audiably transparent (even the very cheap ones) will sound the same. An amplifiers immunity to RF interference is also a factor when partnered a badly designed DAC that gives of an excessive amount of RF interference.

So, which is the cheapest compentently designed DAC that is audiably transparent and will therefore sound the same.

No theory, no BS, straight answer, please.
 

SteveR750

Well-known member
Anderson said:
@steve do you think the difference you're hearing is due to the output stage from the laptop rather than the laptops DAC being of poor quality?

More than likely, yes. I was using these examples as DAC amps.

That said, I searched for ages for an upgrade to my dacmagic plus. It was only once I'd got to a chord qute that I could hear a real improvement. That was using the same PC/J River and Caspian M2
 

steve_1979

Well-known member
Jul 14, 2010
231
10
18,795
Visit site
nima said:
steve_1979 said:
DAC's can sound different. Here's why:

Some DAC's give off more RF interference than others and some amplifiers are more immune to this RF interference than others which is why differences can sometimes be heard. Some DAC's are badly designed or are deliberately made to sound different with the use of filters.

So... A more accurate way of putting it is that all compentently designed DAC's that are audiably transparent (even the very cheap ones) will sound the same. An amplifiers immunity to RF interference is also a factor when partnered a badly designed DAC that gives of an excessive amount of RF interference.

So, which is the cheapest compentently designed DAC that is audiably transparent and will therefore sound the same.

No theory, no BS, straight answer, please.

The Cambridge Audio DACmagic is an audiably transparent DAC which is as good as a Benchmark DAC so maybe this one.

http://kenrockwell.com/audio/cambridge/dacmagic-plus.htm
 

steve_1979

Well-known member
Jul 14, 2010
231
10
18,795
Visit site

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts