JohnDuncan:al7478:
JohnDuncan:Whereas IMO they didn't (on balance). Though I think it would depend very much on the room.
"On balance"? Wonder if you mean "the AVIs are better but not by enough to justify the price"...? I'm not saying that is or isnt the case, just wondered about the use of that phrase.
The AVIs are cleaner and more organised and most of the traditional hifi qualities are 'better', but the extra bass of the Aktimates made them more (waggles fingers) "musical" and that, together with their price, made them a more attractive prospect to me. Like Andrew, I thought a sub would be essential with the 9.1s, and adding one would no doubt make them a serious alternative, but without - and in that room, which no doubt plays a part - I couldn't buy them.
Thanks, am leaning towards the Aktimates as I'm hoping for a fuller (more fun?) sound. Continue to read that the main issue with the AVIs is the lack of bass and as the Aktimates are less than 3 times the price, I think the decision is made.