the_lhc:strapped for cash:the_lhc:strapped for cash:
the_lhc:Got to admit I'm with BC, Dylan is one of the long list of artists I "don't get" (that Christmas album, I mean, really? Sounded more like The Muppets).
Even if you can't get past the voice, it's hard to deny Dylan's influence; and quite frankly, with the **** that passes for lyrics these days, I'll defend Mr Zimmerman all day long...
No I wouldn't deny the influence but I wouldn't listen to it because of that. I'm not really bothered by his voice either to be honest, it's the music I find a bit dull.
I'm not much of a fan of the singer-songwriter-busker sort of genre really, I prefer something interesting to be happening musically, one man and his guitar is recipe for snoresville I find, unless it's someone like Seasick Steve, who manages to make it sound a bit different, other than that I'm quite happy listening to instrumentals!
Fair enough, but Dylan has been so prolific an artist. and changed musical styles (and collaborators) so many times, that I don't think his music can be dismissed as simply "one man and his guitar." At the very least you'd have to add a harmonica to the list...
I dunno, I'd just rather listen to Jimmy Smith hammering away on his organ (uh, could have phrased that better...) than any singer really.
I'm with you to some extent. Many a song I like musically can be spoiled by awful lyrics. In which case I'd rather hear instrumental versions...