I am getting a new cartridge soon for my Rega P2 and would like to know from other Rega P* users which geometry they favour, Stevenson or Baerwald?
I have printed off both Stevenson and Baerwald Arc protractors for a Rega (222mm arm pivot to spindle distance) and pasted to card from here... http://www.vinylengine.com/cartridge-alignment-protractors.shtml ... and ensured the print was not 're-scaled'. (reference measurements are exact even after pasting.)
I have read a little on the theory of both geometries. The Baerwald emphasises that the distortion at three points (beginning of LP, middle and end) should all be equal, whereas the Stevenson geometry emphasises that distortion should be at a minimum towards the end of a side where such distortion has the most audible effect.
Rega themselves favour the Stevenson geometry when factory fitting their own cartridges and their one-point protractor reflects this.
Assuming the new cartridge (on the P2's RB250) has enough movement in the headshell slots to allow both, with correct overhang, which geometry would you use?
Or rather, which geometry DO you use? (Stevenson & Baerwald geometries are applicable to all turntables so I assume this decision is made quite regularly.)
Comment from WHF experts would also be most welcome. (Clare? You are an avid vinyl junkie I seem to remember.)
Thanks.
I have printed off both Stevenson and Baerwald Arc protractors for a Rega (222mm arm pivot to spindle distance) and pasted to card from here... http://www.vinylengine.com/cartridge-alignment-protractors.shtml ... and ensured the print was not 're-scaled'. (reference measurements are exact even after pasting.)
I have read a little on the theory of both geometries. The Baerwald emphasises that the distortion at three points (beginning of LP, middle and end) should all be equal, whereas the Stevenson geometry emphasises that distortion should be at a minimum towards the end of a side where such distortion has the most audible effect.
Rega themselves favour the Stevenson geometry when factory fitting their own cartridges and their one-point protractor reflects this.
Assuming the new cartridge (on the P2's RB250) has enough movement in the headshell slots to allow both, with correct overhang, which geometry would you use?
Or rather, which geometry DO you use? (Stevenson & Baerwald geometries are applicable to all turntables so I assume this decision is made quite regularly.)
Comment from WHF experts would also be most welcome. (Clare? You are an avid vinyl junkie I seem to remember.)
Thanks.