Where engineering equipement is merely applying sience, following rules of good practice. Reviewing equipement is subjective. But there has to be a consensus, an agreement between tastes.
Having read some WHF reviews i noticed a lot of recurring key words. I think it would be helpfull (to me as wel to others) to put them in perspective or on a scale.
The objective hifi spectrum:
harsh - sharp - bright - good clarity - transparent - neutral / flat - lean - warm - disorganized - muddy
Is this correct? Can you add some keywords?
There are also keywords of which I don't know how to put them the above scale:
attacking, musical, detailled, good timing, entertaining, refinement, precision, definition, smooth, bite, rythmic, control
Therefore i think these are far more subjective. Is it possible to put these in relation to one another?
Having read some WHF reviews i noticed a lot of recurring key words. I think it would be helpfull (to me as wel to others) to put them in perspective or on a scale.
The objective hifi spectrum:
harsh - sharp - bright - good clarity - transparent - neutral / flat - lean - warm - disorganized - muddy
Is this correct? Can you add some keywords?
There are also keywords of which I don't know how to put them the above scale:
attacking, musical, detailled, good timing, entertaining, refinement, precision, definition, smooth, bite, rythmic, control
Therefore i think these are far more subjective. Is it possible to put these in relation to one another?