What would be better Kef R100s with a Kef C4 subwoofer or the R300s without a sub

[Danny1]

What would be better Kef R100s with a Kef C4 subwoofer or the R300s without a sub. I already have a Kef C4 sub so do I save a lot of cash and just get the R100s?

Thanks

 

[CnoEvil]

There are too many variables at play to give you a definitive answer, such as:
- Personal preference
- The size of the room
- The positioning of the speakers
- The quality of the amp, and its ability to control the speakers.

FWIW. I would prefer the R300s, provided they have room to breathe, have an amp that can control their bass, and they are put on decent heavy stands. Subs can be tricky to fully integrate properly.

This is a decision you have to make by (preferably) doing a home dem.

 

[Frank Harvey]

Ignoring the variables mentioned by Cno, and answering your question directly, my answer would be the R300s, a three way speaker which are quite noticeably better than the two way R100s. Well designed three way speakers bring benefits across the whole frequency range.

 

[Danny1]

Thanks for the constructive feedback, I also have taken on your point we talked about withe the Q300 being easier to drive . I guess I am thinking long term for when I eventually upgrade my amp too

 

[lpv]

any Kef speakers needs 'warm' and powerfull amp..

and to answer your question - Kef R300 + sub ... because any stereo system will benefit the sub.. 2 are better then 1

 

[lpv]

.. and no, it's not difficult to integrate sub with your speakers, you just have to know how and you can learn that easily from the web.. rel site is a good start.. your ears are ultimate refference