TV licence is going up

[admin_exported]

... by a whole £3!

And as long the BBC spend the money on more high quality HD programs (if possible with Sir David commenting on them) then it's ok by me.

 

[Ravey Gravey Davy]

momo72:

... by a whole £3!

And as long the BBC spend the money on more high quality HD programs (if possible with Sir David commenting on them) then it's ok by me.

Well I can see the red rag,but no bulls yet.

 

[idc]

Spoke to the bull, he is not happy...........................

 

[Anonymous]

Ravey Gravey Davy:momo72:

... by a whole £3!

And as long the BBC spend the money on more high quality HD programs (if possible with Sir David commenting on them) then it's ok by me.

Well I can see the red rag,but no bulls yet.

So thats about £2.74 per week.

I'm probably in a minority of one but if I would like to see more funding for the BBC to compete better with Sky and bring some much needed competition and therefore better pricing.

 

[Anonymous]

idc:

Spoke to the bull, he is not happy...........................

Even more bulls/wilderbeests/salmon and sardines in High Definition from April then!

 

[chebby]

heystak:So thats about £2.74 per week.

I'm probably in a minority of one but if I would like to see more funding for the BBC to compete better with Sky and bring some much needed competition and therefore better pricing.

Minority of two.

I completely agree with you.

 

[Anonymous]

aint got a tv licence, mind you aint got a tv either, got rid of it about 3 years ago, best thing i ever did.

 

[Anonymous]

momo72:
... by a whole £3!

And as long the BBC spend the money on more high quality HD programs (if possible with Sir David commenting on them) then it's ok by me.

I would have preferred better use of existing funds, too many exorbitant salaries, to much soap and reality TV, this alone makes it expensive for my money.

 

[John Duncan]

JCR1:too many exorbitant salaries, to much soap and reality TV, this alone makes it expensive for my money.

Actually Andrew did a post recently of what it's spent on, and it's the complete opposite to what you'd think - ie a certain Mr Ross is cheap

 

[John Duncan]

JCR1:too much soap

That'll be The Archers out then?

 

[Clare Newsome]

No! (Well, at least not until we work out whether Matt's going to prison; and the fate of Tom's pigs)

 

[Anonymous]

JohnDuncan:JCR1:too many exorbitant salaries, to much soap and reality TV, this alone makes it expensive for my money.

Actually Andrew did a post recently of what it's spent on, and it's the complete opposite to what you'd think - ie a certain Mr Ross is cheap

I Agree JD that Ross is Cheap, just comes with an expensive salary

 

[John Duncan]

Clare Newsome:Well, at least not until we work out.....the fate of Tom's pigs

 

[matthewpiano]

chebby:
heystak:So thats about £2.74 per week.

I'm probably in a minority of one but if I would like to see more funding for the BBC to compete better with Sky and bring some much needed competition and therefore better pricing.

Minority of two.

I completely agree with you.

Minority of three. Big fan of the BBC.

 

[Anonymous]

the bbc in full flight hd i would be willing to pay more,
at the moment it costs the price off a pint beer or ten cigs a week, cheap i think yes

 

[Anonymous]

I didnt bother renewing my tv licence at the end of feb, it coincided with both my pvr playing up even more and the indoor booster ariel giving up the ghost.

I have to say i really haven't missed it. Other than the endless QI and Friends and Never Mind the Buzzcocks reruns in the evenings as i fell asleep i didn't really watch it. The only other thing is the saturday morning kitchen (and the sunday program).

Not really worth the fee IMO. Although without it i couldn't then have bought the Attenborough programs in DVD.