thread blank

[GSB]

hi,started a thread last night and read a few of the posts.

this morning there were more posts,but when i open the thread it's blank......have i upset whifi?if your sick of my ramblings you only have to say.... :rofl:

 

[CnoEvil]

I think you've officially been declared "persona non grata". :roll:

 

[Dave_]

Not just you.

And, before anyone suggests it...

I've cleared my cache, cookies etc.

Also tried various browsers on 3 different devices and it's the same on all of then - A blank page.

 

[Dave_]

The offending thread > http://www.whathifi.com/forum/freesat-freeview-sky-and-virgin/dolby-d-ex

 

[GSB]

I think you've officially been declared "persona non grata". :roll:

is that french for ''stop littering my site you ******* bollox **** of a camel's wank '' :quest:

was interested to hear about the codec's folk use too :doh:

 

[bigboss]

The offending thread > http://www.whathifi.com/forum/freesat-freeview-sky-and-virgin/dolby-d-ex

Yes, appears blank to me as well on my iPad.

 

[CnoEvil]

I think you've officially been declared "persona non grata". :roll:

is that french for ''stop littering my site you ******* bollox **** of a camel's wank '' :quest:

was interested to hear about the codec's folk use too :doh:

Dunno....it's all greek to me!

I use a codec instamatic! 😳

 

[BenLaw]

The offending thread > http://www.whathifi.com/forum/freesat-freeview-sky-and-virgin/dolby-d-ex

Yes, appears blank to me as well on my iPad.

And on my latop using Chrome.

 

[Dave_]

Doesn't work in Chrome, Firefox and IE (yuk) on my W7 machine, stock browser or FF Beta on my Nexus 7, Chrome, Opera or Dolphin on my HOX.

Does work in the stock browser on my old Desire.

 

[GSB]

so what did the lhc have to say....?

that's always good for a laff 😉

 

[Dave_]

DD EX is better than DD

 

[GSB]

that's what wikipedia says,realised that if avr set to optical and my pressence speakers are on(dsp),DD EX is the codec,but if i use straight then it's DD.

i'll just set the avr to HDMI....i hate making decisions 😳

 

[Dave_]

It isn't better IMO. Its psuedo 6.1...

Psuedo anything is never better than the real thing

 

[The_Lhc]

It isn't better IMO. Its psuedo 6.1...

Psuedo anything is never better than the real thing

It's not pseudo anything, that implies the information isn't there and is being guessed by the processor, the rear channel information IS there in DD ex, it just isn't in a discrete channel, it's matrixed into the surround channels but that doesn't mean it's being made up.

DD ex IS better than DD, it's nonsense to say otherwise.

 

[The_Lhc]

The other thread looks perfectly ok to me incidentally.

 

[chebby]

The other thread looks perfectly ok to me incidentally.

Yep...

 

[Andrew Everard]

The fact that some can see the thread, while others can't, suggests to me that one of our servers may be out of whack (technical term) with the others.

Have booted the problem up the chain of command (I hesitate to use the term 'escalated the problem') in the hope that someone may be able to make more than an uneducated guess (as I have).

 

[Andy Clough]

Just had a look at this and I'm afraid I've no idea what's causing it. Very strange. I'll have to talk to our internet tech team on Monday.