Technics Su vx 500 amplifier

Prometeo

New member
Jun 18, 2014
1
0
0
Visit site
Hi,
What about the old Technics Su vx 500 amplifier? I have one and I think it sounds well enough. I don’t know if I would buy a Marantz Pm 5004 amplifier I could have a better sound or not. I use it with a Marantz cd player.

Thanks
 

steve4232

New member
May 20, 2014
6
0
0
Visit site
Many years ago I owned a Technics amplifier. I thought it was ok until I went to a "proper" Hi-Fi shop and heard other amps including Ion Obelisk, Naim Audio, Marantz, Cyrus, Rotel, Exposure, Arcam to name a few.

The Technics sounded pretty bad to be honest when compared with modestly priced products from the above brands. In fact it was demonstrated to me by how much the Technics was totally screwing up the source signal. I chucked it out as quickly as I could and moved on and have gladly never looked back. For me, Panasonic make decent vacuum cleaners and TV's. None of their subsidaries make decent Hi-Fi in my honest opinion.

I recall I bought a Naim Nait 2 as a result of hearing how my Technics amp was crucifying the music.
 

Vladimir

New member
Dec 26, 2013
220
7
0
Visit site
Panasonic spends more on liquid soap for the office toilets in a year than the whole Naim operation since 1973.

http://audio-heritage.jp/TECHNICS/speaker/index2.html

http://audio-heritage.jp/TECHNICS/unit/index.html

http://audio-heritage.jp/TECHNICS/player/index3.html

http://audio-heritage.jp/TECHNICS/player/index2.html

http://audio-heritage.jp/TECHNICS/amp/index2.html

http://audio-heritage.jp/TECHNICS/amp/index.html

http://audio-heritage.jp/TECHNICS/etc/index.html

http://audio-heritage.jp/TECHNICS/etc/index2.html



Gues who uses electoronic components from Panasonic? Ion Obelisk, Naim Audio, Marantz, Cyrus, Rotel, Exposure, Arcam, satelites, space ships and submarines, to name a few.
 

Mohsin

Well-known member
Jul 26, 2008
15
0
18,520
Visit site
While I agree that a brand like Naim would turn out better audio equipment then Technics did I think they are totally different price categories so not a fair comparison. I have had alot of Technics gear over the years and other then a minidisc jog dial going wrong I have never had any issues with any of the rest. Technics made some decent equipment but as there is so much of it still out there its difficult knowing which models to look out for. I had a su-v670pxs which I had planned to add a power amp to but never got around to it so ended up selling the amp but it was a decent all rounder.

I dont know how your su-vx500 will compare to the Marant 5004 but I dont think it will be a huge improvement if any.

Mo
 

steve4232

New member
May 20, 2014
6
0
0
Visit site
LOL! Thanks for those links, Vlad! The old RS640U - my father still has a mint example of one of those WITH dust cover, bought new in 1973! Of course Technics has made some decent equipment over the years but its parent company, Panansonic, specialises in nothing in particular, it makes everything quite well. Generally speaking large organisations that manufacture components for everything in the domestic market and items for space ships, tend to be very efficient at everything but excel at nothing. They are making huge volumes of components to a price to cover every eventuality. They are not trying to re-invent the wheel or to produce the best Hi-Fi system in the world. If they were, they've failed.
 

Vladimir

New member
Dec 26, 2013
220
7
0
Visit site
The mistery to all audiophiles in the world is why such well built japanese amps sounded so dry and hollow. It is possible that the low idle current + high damping factor + large global negative feedback contributed to this. When I experimented with the idle current, increasing it certanly improved things.
 

steve4232

New member
May 20, 2014
6
0
0
Visit site
I wouldn't say my Technics was "dry", more "dirty" sounding if anything. If audio can be described in terms of colour, it tended to turn everything "brown".
 

steve4232

New member
May 20, 2014
6
0
0
Visit site
So if Naim uses Panasonic components, it certainly knows how to utilise them much better than Technics! I think power supplies are key here too.
 

Vladimir

New member
Dec 26, 2013
220
7
0
Visit site
How about intentional voicing? Maybe in Japan and Germany (Japan's biggest hi-fi market) they enjoy bright an screetchy sound on amps with many buttons and shiny lights.
 

Tarxman

New member
Jul 3, 2009
64
0
0
Visit site
http://audio-heritage.jp/TECHNICS/speaker/sb-400.html

Had these hooked up to my system yesterday, right before I gave them back to my father.
 

nima

New member
Jan 15, 2014
29
0
0
Visit site
steve4232 said:
Many years ago I owned a Technics amplifier. I thought it was ok until I went to a "proper" Hi-Fi shop and heard other amps

I think you, if you bring home a decent budget amp, you will be surprised how much more clear it will sound compared to old Technics.

I'm sure you will find Technich muddy, veiled, without drive and punch, lacking in every aspect of music reproduction.

Marantz wouldn't be my first choice though.
 

manicm

Well-known member
From '85/86 onwards with their so called Class AA amps, Technics ran rapidly downhill, they became mediocre indeed. So yes ordinarily I wouldn't give the SU VX 500 a second look. If you can stretch your budget I'd look at the Marantz PM 6005 which at 300 quid undiscounted is good value.
 

peterpiper

New member
Mar 20, 2014
11
0
0
Visit site
Technics made some bomb proof DD turntables, I remember owning a project debut, thought it was a pile of poo, and put me off vinyl , flimsy microphonic build with an elastic band powering it , then i decided to dip my toes in again with a used SL1300 for a mere 70 pounds, heavy slab of 70;s enginnering, ahhh so this is how I remember vinyl, The technics bashing is a bit unfair . Cant comment on the amps though, never had one
 

nima

New member
Jan 15, 2014
29
0
0
Visit site
peterpiper said:
Technics made some bomb proof DD turntables, I remember owning a project debut, thought it was a pile of poo, and put me off vinyl , flimsy microphonic build with an elastic band powering it , then i decided to dip my toes in again with a used SL1300 for a mere 70 pounds, heavy slab of 70;s enginnering, ahhh so this is how I remember vinyl, The technics bashing is a bit unfair . Cant comment on the amps though, never had one

It's not the SL1300, it's the 440MLa you love so much, just kidding. On the other hand it's not so difficult to put Pro-ject Debut to shame.

I have tried various Technics amps with different power ratings from 70s, 80s and 90s. None was decent.
 

manicm

Well-known member
nima said:
peterpiper said:
Technics made some bomb proof DD turntables, I remember owning a project debut, thought it was a pile of poo, and put me off vinyl , flimsy microphonic build with an elastic band powering it , then i decided to dip my toes in again with a used SL1300 for a mere 70 pounds, heavy slab of 70;s enginnering, ahhh so this is how I remember vinyl, The technics bashing is a bit unfair . Cant comment on the amps though, never had one

It's not the SL1300, it's the 440MLa you love so much, just kidding. On the other hand it's not so difficult to put Pro-ject Debut to shame.

I have tried various Technics amps with different power ratings from 70s, 80s and 90s. None was decent.

Some of the New Class A ones were excellent - the V and X ranges in the early 80s. And as peterpiper pointed out, they made some great direct drive turntables as well - even Linn acknowledged that.
 

peterpiper

New member
Mar 20, 2014
11
0
0
Visit site
nima said:
peterpiper said:
Technics made some bomb proof DD turntables, I remember owning a project debut, thought it was a pile of poo, and put me off vinyl , flimsy microphonic build with an elastic band powering it , then i decided to dip my toes in again with a used SL1300 for a mere 70 pounds, heavy slab of 70;s enginnering, ahhh so this is how I remember vinyl, The technics bashing is a bit unfair . Cant comment on the amps though, never had one

It's not the SL1300, it's the 440MLa you love so much, just kidding. On the other hand it's not so difficult to put Pro-ject Debut to shame.

I have tried various Technics amps with different power ratings from 70s, 80s and 90s. None was decent.

the 440mla is a lovely cartridge, and cost more than double the technics deck ! but works great on it , I think think these technics are great second hand buys, the SL1300 is based on the SL1200 or vice versa, but with a slightly weaker motor, but you would never know for home hifi use and its why you can get them a good prices if you are patient

DJ and scratchers want SL1200's only, not the likes of the SL1300 , the SL1200's have probably seen time in a club at some piont, the SL1300 would have definatly not and therfore likley to have been looked after better, not that the SL1200 cant take abuse, its probably the most robust TT ever built
 

Paul_1970

New member
Jan 6, 2016
0
0
0
Visit site
I know this is a late post but I have a pair of 1984 SU-V4X amps. They're lovely lively little things with great sound and clarity. They punch well above their weight. I really don't want to part with them and if I did it'd be circa £1k to find a decent replacement.
 

manicm

Well-known member
Paul_1970 said:
I know this is a late post but I have a pair of 1984 SU-V4X amps. They're lovely lively little things with great sound and clarity. They punch well above their weight. I really don't want to part with them and if I did it'd be circa £1k to find a decent replacement.

We had one for 19 years and it was frankly brilliant. Unfortunately it could not be repaired, no parts etc. If they're in perfect working order don't let them go! I'm also inclined to think you'd have to spend 1k for an equivalent. They sure did heat up the room though!
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts