- May 21, 2008
- 47
- 0
- 0
it seems to me i'm doomed to go on with the nad sound, since it suits my ears best (for its price range) , so to build some new (certainly cheap) system around a nad compo (btw what's your opinion about this year's 515bee cd?) i was thinking of the subject's two different speakers. i've auditioned the latter , i loved its sound, if only it had a LLLLitle more bass, do not want to have booming, juuuust a little more bass. havent had the chance to listen to mercury f1, though... (and i see it gets nice reviews, it's CHEAP especially when you buy from e-bay, but i'll be based on your suggestions, which i trust...)
so, what's the difference (from your experience) in sound between the two different makes and particular speakers ?
moreover, would you suggest some third make and model to match a level-entry (yet intending to cover hours+hours of old rock, blues and mainly jazz+classical music) nad (amp+cd) system .
would it be wise to match my nad amp with the 515 or some other nad cd, instead of the new marantz i was intending to buy?
thanks a lot.
indi@
so, what's the difference (from your experience) in sound between the two different makes and particular speakers ?
moreover, would you suggest some third make and model to match a level-entry (yet intending to cover hours+hours of old rock, blues and mainly jazz+classical music) nad (amp+cd) system .
would it be wise to match my nad amp with the 515 or some other nad cd, instead of the new marantz i was intending to buy?
thanks a lot.
indi@