Streamers - What is the point?

inbox4

Well-known member
Aug 27, 2007
32
0
18,540
Visit site
Original post should have read...

I can’t help but think I'm missing something....

I've been reading Linn's and Cyrus' web sites to learn more about their respective streamers.

Currently I connect a MacBook Air via USB to an async DAC. This obviously allows me to play Spotify and my iTunes library etc and it sounds great.

I can't see what extra a dedicated streamer would offer?

Surely a laptop connected to a DAC (via async USB) is a very similar solution and generally cheaper (assuming you already own the DAC)

Am I missing the point?

I'd be interested to hear different views....
 

John Duncan

Well-known member
inbox4 said:
Original post should have read...

I can’t help but think I'm missing something....

I've been reading Linn's and Cyrus' web sites to learn more about their respective streamers.

Currently I connect a MacBook Air via USB to an async DAC. This obviously allows me to play Spotify and my iTunes library etc and it sounds great.

I can't see what extra a dedicated streamer would offer?

Surely a laptop connected to a DAC (via async USB) is a very similar solution and generally cheaper (assuming you already own the DAC)

Am I missing the point?

I'd be interested to hear different views....

True, but in my opinion I'd rather not be tethered to the stereo by a USB cable. How much value one puts on that is up to the individual I guess.
 

cheeseboy

New member
Jul 17, 2012
245
1
0
Visit site
inbox4 said:
Am I missing the point?

I'd be interested to hear different views....

no, you're not missing the point. A streamer is basically a computer, probably running a version of linux in a box without all the keyboard and mouse gubbins and only does one thing.

Some people have computers that sound like jet enginges when they turn them on, so it's understandable they don't want them running to listen to music. For some people it's conceptual barrier - ie computers don't play music, that's what stereos do. For others they may use both, for some it's costs etc. It just all depends on what you want and how you want to do it.
 

iMark

Well-known member
We find the Airport Express very useful. My Mac Mini, with the iTunes library is in another room. We can use the iPad as a remote control for the iTunes library or stream Spotify directly to the Airport Express. My ripped CDs sound better than any of my previous CD players.

In our previous house I had the computer in the same room as the stereo and had it connected with long RCA cables. Not a very good solution and it caused all sorts of ground loop problems.

I definetly recommend getting some sort of streamer if you have music library on a computer.
 

emperor's new clothes

Well-known member
May 28, 2013
35
2
18,545
Visit site
As a regular visitor to the USA over the last 37 years, I have enjoyed their radio stations - classic rock in particular. Now I can stream them here, I rarely listen to Uk stations on FM and dont bother with low bit rate Dab rubbish. SBT feeds the HiFi, ATV and AV amp the lounge and iMac to headphones via rPac. Downloaded podcasts can be streamed to the TV and old favourites checked out on youtube.
In addition, Marantz UD7007 lives up to the universal banner by streaming Netflixs in excellent, near BluRay quality, sound and vision - check out Breaking Bad and House of cards.
I still prefer the silver disc including SACDs and BluRays for movies, but streaming is a major boon for AV enjoyment. Whats not to like?
 

steve_1979

Well-known member
Jul 14, 2010
231
10
18,795
Visit site
iMark said:
We find the Airport Express very useful. My Mac Mini, with the iTunes library is in another room. We can use the iPad as a remote control for the iTunes library or stream Spotify directly to the Airport Express. My ripped CDs sound better than any of my previous CD players.

In our previous house I had the computer in the same room as the stereo and had it connected with long RCA cables. Not a very good solution and it caused all sorts of ground loop problems.

I definetly recommend getting some sort of streamer if you have music library on a computer.

Provided you connect your computer to the stereo using a digital cable (or Airport Express) you won't get any of those issues . The sound quality would probably be better by using the DAC in your hifi to convert the digital signal too.
 

steve_1979

Well-known member
Jul 14, 2010
231
10
18,795
Visit site
cheeseboy said:
inbox4 said:
Am I missing the point?

I'd be interested to hear different views....

no, you're not missing the point. A streamer is basically a computer, probably running a version of linux in a box without all the keyboard and mouse gubbins and only does one thing.

Some people have computers that sound like jet enginges when they turn them on, so it's understandable they don't want them running to listen to music. For some people it's conceptual barrier - ie computers don't play music, that's what stereos do. For others they may use both, for some it's costs etc. It just all depends on what you want and how you want to do it.

Good post cheeseboy. :clap:
 

inbox4

Well-known member
Aug 27, 2007
32
0
18,540
Visit site
Thanks everyone for your comments.

It sounds like I did understand streamers after all!

I enjoy the way I stream music using my laptop at the moment.

The MacBook Air is completely silent so I don't have any of the noisy computer issues sited as a reason to use a streamer (and it sounds great)

The only drawback I do have is when my computer is attached to my hifi I cant use it as its no where near my listening position. (Although I often prefer to just sit and listen). If I were to work round this, I think I would prefer to buy a used MacBook purely for permanent audio duties rather than a dedicated hifi streamer.
 

CnoEvil

New member
Aug 21, 2009
556
14
0
Visit site
IMO. The only way to know if a streamer has something extra, is to listen to a well designed one.......and I (unsurprisingly) recommend a Linn DS, which starts off with the Sneaky.
 

jerry klinger

New member
Jun 26, 2010
37
0
0
Visit site
But the bit of the streamer that makes the difference sound quality wise is the DAC anyway - witness the number of Naim users who first buy a £3000 streamer and then feel the need to add a £2000 DAC (plus a £3-6000 power supply). To me a typical streamer is an internet tuner which can also get music from file storage which I don't actually have. If I want to play music on computer I'd plug a laptop into a DAC. The internet tuner bit is usually well-implemented with vTuner and thus easier to use than a puter but that's about it. Expensive streamers = large white elephants. I've owned a couple and have often felt 'what's the point?'
 

inbox4

Well-known member
Aug 27, 2007
32
0
18,540
Visit site
@ jerry klinger - I tend to agree with you about white elephants so far...

@ CnoEvil - it was reading your previous posts and enthusiasm for Linn streamers that pricked my interest today and led me to their web site and to start this thread.

@ p_m_brown - thanks for the recommendation. I've just briefly checked out the Connect and I'm disappointed to see that it doesn't have a USB output. I know I could connect it to the DAC via optical but I have a real preference for using USB as I get such a great result at the moment.

I currently have an Apple TV connected to the hifi so I can stream to it via my phone, iPad and computer wirelessly if I want to. I'm guessing the Sonos would offer exactly the same functionality?

When I run Spotify on my laptop and connect it to the DAC via USB, it sounds MUCH better than airplaying to the Apple TV.
 

CnoEvil

New member
Aug 21, 2009
556
14
0
Visit site
jerry klinger said:
But the bit of the streamer that makes the difference sound quality wise is the DAC anyway - witness the number of Naim users who first buy a £3000 streamer and then feel the need to add a £2000 DAC (plus a £3-6000 power supply). To me a typical streamer is an internet tuner which can also get music from file storage which I don't actually have. If I want to play music on computer I'd plug a laptop into a DAC. The internet tuner bit is usually well-implemented with vTuner and thus easier to use than a puter but that's about it. Expensive streamers = large white elephants. I've owned a couple and have often felt 'what's the point?'

IME. A streamer is the sum of its design, including quality of power supply; clocking, how well upsampling is handled; order / quality of noise filters / shapers etc. Get this right, and the streamer will more than hold its own.
 

inbox4

Well-known member
Aug 27, 2007
32
0
18,540
Visit site
CnoEvil said:
jerry klinger said:
But the bit of the streamer that makes the difference sound quality wise is the DAC anyway - witness the number of Naim users who first buy a £3000 streamer and then feel the need to add a £2000 DAC (plus a £3-6000 power supply). To me a typical streamer is an internet tuner which can also get music from file storage which I don't actually have. If I want to play music on computer I'd plug a laptop into a DAC. The internet tuner bit is usually well-implemented with vTuner and thus easier to use than a puter but that's about it. Expensive streamers = large white elephants. I've owned a couple and have often felt 'what's the point?'

IME. A streamer is the sum of its design, including quality of power supply; clocking, how well upsampling is handled; order / quality of noise filters / shapers etc. Get this right, and the streamer will more than hold its own.

Are a lot of things you mentioned not handled by the DAC, especailly when connecting via USB as the DAC syncs the clocks both ends?
 

CnoEvil

New member
Aug 21, 2009
556
14
0
Visit site
inbox4 said:
@ CnoEvil - it was reading your previous posts and enthusiasm for Linn streamers that pricked my interest today and led me to their web site and to start this thread.

All I want to do, is to bring different options to the table, so as people can listen for themselves and make up their own mind.

With Hifi, it's very easy to get tunnel vision or let old prejudices steer the decision (often wrongly).
 

CnoEvil

New member
Aug 21, 2009
556
14
0
Visit site
inbox4 said:
CnoEvil said:
jerry klinger said:
But the bit of the streamer that makes the difference sound quality wise is the DAC anyway - witness the number of Naim users who first buy a £3000 streamer and then feel the need to add a £2000 DAC (plus a £3-6000 power supply). To me a typical streamer is an internet tuner which can also get music from file storage which I don't actually have. If I want to play music on computer I'd plug a laptop into a DAC. The internet tuner bit is usually well-implemented with vTuner and thus easier to use than a puter but that's about it. Expensive streamers = large white elephants. I've owned a couple and have often felt 'what's the point?'

IME. A streamer is the sum of its design, including quality of power supply; clocking, how well upsampling is handled; order / quality of noise filters / shapers etc. Get this right, and the streamer will more than hold its own.

Are a lot of things you mentioned not handled by the DAC, especailly when connecting via USB as the DAC syncs the clocks both ends?

If the dac is asynchronous, it will (I believe) deal with the clocking.

Here is Linn's description of what their DS does, which leaves the Dac playing a relatively small part, as they take over the processing (post.2): http://forums.linn.co.uk/bb/showthread.php?tid=15456
 

kmlav

New member
Jun 28, 2009
36
0
0
Visit site
If you take the view that its all just a bunch of 1s and 0s and nothing really makes a ounce of difference to the SQ until you get to the DAC I am sure you will very happy with a home computing device to DAC set up.

I would only advise anyone looking at a digital HiFi set up is to go and check out what is available with a open mind and make your choice based on how you feel about the music.
 

steve_1979

Well-known member
Jul 14, 2010
231
10
18,795
Visit site
CnoEvil said:
IME. A streamer is the sum of its design, including quality of power supply; clocking, how well upsampling is handled; order / quality of noise filters / shapers etc. Get this right, and the streamer will more than hold its own.

How is it possible to improve on any hifi streamer or computer that can output a BIT PERFECT data stream to an external DAC?

It's already BIT PERFECT (the clue's in the name BTW).
 

CnoEvil

New member
Aug 21, 2009
556
14
0
Visit site
p_m_brown said:
I'd be up for checking out a Linn DS to see how it fairs against my Sonos and Leema dac which btw, sounds superb with the coaxial output!

...and I'd like to hear your verdict (no matter what it is).
 

CnoEvil

New member
Aug 21, 2009
556
14
0
Visit site
steve_1979 said:
CnoEvil said:
IME. A streamer is the sum of its design, including quality of power supply; clocking, how well upsampling is handled; order / quality of noise filters / shapers etc. Get this right, and the streamer will more than hold its own.

How is it possible to improve on any hifi streamer or computer that can output a BIT PERFECT data stream to an external DAC?

It's already BIT PERFECT (the clue's in the name BTW).

By a cheap dac and be happy.........why look further, as companies like DCS, Linn, Devialet and Naim are simply taking the P......Foo merchants, the lot of 'em. :grin:

Listening for yourself is way over rated, as anything that defies science can't possibly be right. :p
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts