- Aug 10, 2019
- 2,556
- 5
- 0
I popped into the Sony Centre on High Street Kensington to get some headphones.
On display were both a 40w5710 (I think) and a Panasonic 42G10. The Sony had far deeper blacks and purer whites as well as bolder colours. The source was then changed and film credits appeared. The Sony handled them superbly, whilst the Panasonic was pretty poor with quite a bit of judder. Again, the contrast levels on the Sony put the Panasonic to shame.
One of the staff members came over and spoke of the bold colours on the Sony compared to the subdued ones on the Panasonic. I was also told of the inherent flaws in Plasma technology and that Sony no longer manufactured plasmas as a result. He spoke of screen burn being a major issue and that Plasmas had a considerably shorter life span.
I was surprised by how poorly the G10 handled motion and how shoddy the contrast levels where, given that I had seen this tv in John Lewis a few months ago and been quite impressed (bar the design of the set) with it.
I wonder if the contrast settings might have been lowered and Intelligent Frame Creation turned off?
The Sony set did look superb though. I know it was light, but the blacks were terrific and the backlight did not seem to seep through at all, and this was on the credits with an almost entirely black screen.
P.S.
I know a similar thread regarding this discussion was locked. My intention isn't to start the whole debate again nor is it to criticise Sony or Sony Centres, just to report my observations on what was a chance encounter with the Sony/Panasonic comparison phenomenon.
I have a Panasonic plasma and the blacks are very dark and the whites very white and I have no problem with judder on the credits, hence my surprise at how badly the G10 performed by comparison.
On display were both a 40w5710 (I think) and a Panasonic 42G10. The Sony had far deeper blacks and purer whites as well as bolder colours. The source was then changed and film credits appeared. The Sony handled them superbly, whilst the Panasonic was pretty poor with quite a bit of judder. Again, the contrast levels on the Sony put the Panasonic to shame.
One of the staff members came over and spoke of the bold colours on the Sony compared to the subdued ones on the Panasonic. I was also told of the inherent flaws in Plasma technology and that Sony no longer manufactured plasmas as a result. He spoke of screen burn being a major issue and that Plasmas had a considerably shorter life span.
I was surprised by how poorly the G10 handled motion and how shoddy the contrast levels where, given that I had seen this tv in John Lewis a few months ago and been quite impressed (bar the design of the set) with it.
I wonder if the contrast settings might have been lowered and Intelligent Frame Creation turned off?
The Sony set did look superb though. I know it was light, but the blacks were terrific and the backlight did not seem to seep through at all, and this was on the credits with an almost entirely black screen.
P.S.
I know a similar thread regarding this discussion was locked. My intention isn't to start the whole debate again nor is it to criticise Sony or Sony Centres, just to report my observations on what was a chance encounter with the Sony/Panasonic comparison phenomenon.
I have a Panasonic plasma and the blacks are very dark and the whites very white and I have no problem with judder on the credits, hence my surprise at how badly the G10 performed by comparison.
