E ear New member Aug 24, 2008 118 0 0 Visit site Sep 3, 2010 #1 taking ages to access...for several days now...
S SteveR750 Well-known member Mar 11, 2005 746 140 19,070 Visit site Sep 4, 2010 #2 I have been waiting 3 months to reply to you., imagine how that feels.
S simonlewis New member Apr 15, 2008 590 1 0 Visit site Sep 4, 2010 #3 Doesn't work for me at all, all i get is "oops this page appears broken" i have to use the reply button all the time.
Doesn't work for me at all, all i get is "oops this page appears broken" i have to use the reply button all the time.
A Anonymous Guest Sep 4, 2010 #4 its pointless anyway , how can it be quicker than a normal reply ? you press reply , or quick reply , and type , and press post , no difference ..
its pointless anyway , how can it be quicker than a normal reply ? you press reply , or quick reply , and type , and press post , no difference ..
scene Well-known member Sep 25, 2008 789 187 19,070 Visit site Sep 4, 2010 #5 Seems to work for me. But then again, I have had the plain text postings only option enabled for iPad compatibility...
Seems to work for me. But then again, I have had the plain text postings only option enabled for iPad compatibility...
S SteveR750 Well-known member Mar 11, 2005 746 140 19,070 Visit site Sep 4, 2010 #6 I managed this reply in 0.38s using the standard procedure. As Max says, why bother.
scene Well-known member Sep 25, 2008 789 187 19,070 Visit site Sep 4, 2010 #7 I agree, it does seem a bit pointless.
E ear New member Aug 24, 2008 118 0 0 Visit site Sep 4, 2010 #8 yes.just been used to use quick reply, and I tend to forget the webpage stalls...one way to remember it is pressing it
yes.just been used to use quick reply, and I tend to forget the webpage stalls...one way to remember it is pressing it
vinod_david Well-known member Nov 18, 2007 150 38 18,620 Visit site Sep 4, 2010 #9 Working perfectly.
A Andrew Everard New member May 30, 2007 1,878 2 0 Visit site Sep 4, 2010 #10 Works fine here, too...
A Anonymous Guest Sep 4, 2010 #11 The quick reply is a local javascript, so no contact with the server is made up to the moment you press Post. Probably something wrong with your browser's javascript or the site uses non-standard js.
The quick reply is a local javascript, so no contact with the server is made up to the moment you press Post. Probably something wrong with your browser's javascript or the site uses non-standard js.
A Andrew Everard New member May 30, 2007 1,878 2 0 Visit site Sep 4, 2010 #12 Pete10:The quick reply is a local javascript ...for local people...
T the record spot Guest Sep 4, 2010 #13 Haymarket staffers night out looks like it went down a treat...
B bluebrazil New member Jul 2, 2009 19 0 0 Visit site Sep 5, 2010 #15 though i do agree its kinda pointless
J JoelSim New member Aug 24, 2007 767 1 0 Visit site Sep 5, 2010 #16 SteveR750:I managed this reply in 0.38s using the standard procedure. As Max says, why bother. 0.38 seconds? If you'd ripped your music to a hard drive first then you could have done it in 4 minutes and 53 seconds. I digress...
SteveR750:I managed this reply in 0.38s using the standard procedure. As Max says, why bother. 0.38 seconds? If you'd ripped your music to a hard drive first then you could have done it in 4 minutes and 53 seconds. I digress...
S SteveR750 Well-known member Mar 11, 2005 746 140 19,070 Visit site Sep 7, 2010 #17 JoelSim: SteveR750:I managed this reply in 0.38s using the standard procedure. As Max says, why bother. 0.38 seconds? If you'd ripped your music to a hard drive first then you could have done it in 4 minutes and 53 seconds. I digress... You lost me back at 986ms.....
JoelSim: SteveR750:I managed this reply in 0.38s using the standard procedure. As Max says, why bother. 0.38 seconds? If you'd ripped your music to a hard drive first then you could have done it in 4 minutes and 53 seconds. I digress... You lost me back at 986ms.....