Progress report

JoelSim

New member
Aug 24, 2007
767
1
0
Well, the 192 definitely seems to have a more realistic 'voice', it really does sing and has more pace than the incumbent 92. Getting more impressed by the day and am now approaching 100 hours I imagine.
 

bigblue235

New member
Aug 22, 2007
82
0
0
Good to hear it!

I've had enough of deliberating over the CD17 vs CD192, so have just ordered the 192.

That'll no doubt mean the CD17 is the better player. When the glowing CD17 WH-F review pops up, the noise you'll hear will be my teeth grinding.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
The CD192 has a very good upsampling system in it - something which the CD17 doesn't have...I wouldn't be at all suprised if the CD192 was on par with the CD17!
 

JoelSim

New member
Aug 24, 2007
767
1
0
bigblue235:
Good to hear it!

I've had enough of deliberating over the CD17 vs CD192, so have just ordered the 192.

That'll no doubt mean the CD17 is the better player. When the glowing CD17 WH-F review pops up, the noise you'll hear will be my teeth grinding.

You'll have to let us know what you think. Don't write anything until it's had 20 hours.
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts