- Jan 18, 2008
- 540
- 5
- 0
Un-boxed and playing for the last few hours; Naim XS/CD5XS/PMCGB1i/Naim cables throughout except for my tuner.
I wished I could be more enthusiastic, especially after my acquaintance with said Naim components a few months ago. It just does'nt involve me the way I remember, not even with my speakers which I used then. Fair enough, my living room is a different lay-out but there is a lack of transparency which is disconcerting. Yes, it does some things better than my current humble system but in a few other areas, it leaves me slightly wanting. It's slightly weightier sounding, projects with a bit more solidity and has a tad more drive/punch but it sounds more different than better. It lacks the transparency and sound stage width, height and order. I know Naim amps are frequency limited to around 20khz or thereabout, which in theory should'nt make to much of an audible difference but compared to my amp, which apparently has a wide-band output stage, it seems slightly 'sat on'.
I only have it today as my time to audition hifi is limited. As it stands, I doubt I can justify spending £4000 or 3k on this system. The speakers where never in the equation anyway but I needed a comparison to my own which worked well with the Naims last time round.
If I was blind listening I'd probably be confused. The Naim is probably more impressive initially and is the better system but I think I'd miss the easy detail of what I have now.
These are demo models and are usually switched on permanent for most of the time anyway. I am slightly perplexed as I liked it more on the last occasion. Either my memory is not great or the room made a big difference. In any case I like to think I have enough 'hifi experience/exposure' to make up for that and hear the fundamentals of a system, or so I hope.
Maybe I'm just not 'tuned in' properly today ...
I wished I could be more enthusiastic, especially after my acquaintance with said Naim components a few months ago. It just does'nt involve me the way I remember, not even with my speakers which I used then. Fair enough, my living room is a different lay-out but there is a lack of transparency which is disconcerting. Yes, it does some things better than my current humble system but in a few other areas, it leaves me slightly wanting. It's slightly weightier sounding, projects with a bit more solidity and has a tad more drive/punch but it sounds more different than better. It lacks the transparency and sound stage width, height and order. I know Naim amps are frequency limited to around 20khz or thereabout, which in theory should'nt make to much of an audible difference but compared to my amp, which apparently has a wide-band output stage, it seems slightly 'sat on'.
I only have it today as my time to audition hifi is limited. As it stands, I doubt I can justify spending £4000 or 3k on this system. The speakers where never in the equation anyway but I needed a comparison to my own which worked well with the Naims last time round.
If I was blind listening I'd probably be confused. The Naim is probably more impressive initially and is the better system but I think I'd miss the easy detail of what I have now.
These are demo models and are usually switched on permanent for most of the time anyway. I am slightly perplexed as I liked it more on the last occasion. Either my memory is not great or the room made a big difference. In any case I like to think I have enough 'hifi experience/exposure' to make up for that and hear the fundamentals of a system, or so I hope.
Maybe I'm just not 'tuned in' properly today ...