MQA file format

Al ears

Moderator
Nov 23, 2008
1,239
391
19,570
Read my post again. I basically told him what you just said. It seems like old knee-jerk habits die hard, I include myself 🙃
Sorry but at no point can I see you mention that it cannot be done, unless I am missing something there, so you didn't tell him what I have just mention. You expressed an opinion regarding the format which is fine but saying don't bother implies it might be possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DougK

manicm

Well-known member
May 1, 2008
454
7
18,895
AI, unless my post was illegible and unreadable, all I said to the OP is not to bother with MQA at all.

It’s that simple, do you need further interpretation?
 

manicm

Well-known member
May 1, 2008
454
7
18,895
AI, apologies, I see what you mean at a stretch, so to the OP, no cannot convert anything to MQA by an end user right now. And MP3 is a compressed, lossy format, so converting to anything else does not make any sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Al ears

Al ears

Moderator
Nov 23, 2008
1,239
391
19,570
AI, apologies, I see what you mean at a stretch, so to the OP, no cannot convert anything to MQA by an end user right now. And MP3 is a compressed, lossy format, so converting to anything else does not make any sense.
Thank you. No interpretation needed, and I agree with your bold statement.
I felt the only area that a proprietary format like MQA could make some headway was with streaming.
 

djh1697

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2008
22
1
18,525
I got an email from WHF with an article saying how great MQA is, however, the article is "sponsored" so it is a paid for advert. MQA folds the music up, and then tries to unfold it. They call it "origami" but it is a HiRes version of MP3. When you fold a flat piece of paper in origami, then unfold it, do you get a the same flat piece of paper after the unfolding?

Gilad T of Linn products did an interesting article on the Linn website about it,

MQA is an excuse for Meridian to print money, everything needs to be MQA certified, licence paid, MQA media produced, licence paid, MQA recording studio, licence paid.

Wiki has an interesting article too! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_Quality_Authenticated
 

djh1697

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2008
22
1
18,525
"Linn don’t like MQA (or more to the point, they don’t want to make the necessary changes to their DAC), so whatever they’re going to say is going to be negative. "

Linn, Naim, Rega, and other manufacturers do not want to pay royalties for using MQA technology, MQA can not be improved upon since you would not be allowed to alter the decoding method? Someone doing a Phd should perhaps reverse engineer MQA as a project, that would not be illegal? I am thinking here about the DR-DOS and MS-DOS war in the later 1980's early 1990's. The reverse engineered DR-DOS was far better IMHO! Unfolding something does not restore the original, even a bed sheet that is folded up will not unfold to it's original shape, try buying one and unwrapping it!
 
Most manufacturers who don’t like MQA don’t want to make the necessary changes to their own DACs, or agree to the requirements for MQA - maybe it bypasses certain aspects of what these manufacturers do to their own DACs that makes them stand out from others...
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts