I going for a demo and was wondering if Marantz Pearl Lite cdp and amp with the Dyn x12s would be a good combination. Not sure what other speakers to try as they don't stock Kefs.
Brio R is only 50w at 8ohm
Hi-FiOutlaw said:Hi
If what i've saw is correct the Marantz has 70w at 8ohm and 100w at 4ohm i think it will be enough for the X12, as they were made to be the easiest Dyns to drive, my Brio R is only 50w at 8ohm and it does a wonderfull job!
The X12 (my opinion) are the moust neutral, transparent speakers that i've demo, a seet seet mid range, perfect with voices and unplugged instruments, the Dyns are detailded, precise and you can almoust ear what the singer is thinking and a strong deeeeep and fast bass response!
And yes, there is a new range, it's been told ( in Dynaudio web page) that this new model is even easier to drive as they are rated at 8ohm and 82db sensibility ... :?
Let us se what the first review say about the new X14, X34 and X38!
stevebrock said:Brio R is only 50w at 8ohm
Did you know they have capped the ouput at 50w? Thats why the Brio R is capable of driving diffucult loads!
BigH said:Hi-FiOutlaw said:Hi
If what i've saw is correct the Marantz has 70w at 8ohm and 100w at 4ohm i think it will be enough for the X12, as they were made to be the easiest Dyns to drive, my Brio R is only 50w at 8ohm and it does a wonderfull job!
The X12 (my opinion) are the moust neutral, transparent speakers that i've demo, a seet seet mid range, perfect with voices and unplugged instruments, the Dyns are detailded, precise and you can almoust ear what the singer is thinking and a strong deeeeep and fast bass response!
And yes, there is a new range, it's been told ( in Dynaudio web page) that this new model is even easier to drive as they are rated at 8ohm and 82db sensibility ... :?
Let us se what the first review say about the new X14, X34 and X38!
Thanks. I see the x12s are not very sensitive, how are they at low volumes?
BigH said:Well the demo is over, I did not like the Dyn X12s. They were detailed yes but they were cool side of neatral but the treble was very forward, you noticed it on every recording also strings to me did not sound natural. I found them similar to the PMC DB1s. So sorry to me they were not very musical, disappointing. Music I played was 70s rock, 50/60s jazz, classical,and female/male vocals.
I also heard some Tannoys 6.1s were were the opposite I suppose, warm but a bit woolly in the bass department.
BigH said:Well the demo is over, I did not like the Dyn X12s. They were detailed yes but they were cool side of neatral but the treble was very forward, you noticed it on every recording also strings to me did not sound natural. I found them similar to the PMC DB1s. So sorry to me they were not very musical, disappointing. Music I played was 70s rock, 50/60s jazz, classical,and female/male vocals.
I also heard some Tannoys 6.1s were were the opposite I suppose, warm but a bit woolly in the bass department.
BigH said:Well the demo is over, I did not like the Dyn X12s. They were detailed yes but they were cool side of neatral but the treble was very forward, you noticed it on every recording also strings to me did not sound natural. I found them similar to the PMC DB1s. So sorry to me they were not very musical, disappointing. Music I played was 70s rock, 50/60s jazz, classical,and female/male vocals.
I also heard some Tannoys 6.1s were were the opposite I suppose, warm but a bit woolly in the bass department.
Hi-FiOutlaw said:Thats why there are so many speakers on the market, all of the with diferent accoustic signature, for me the Dyns are the speakers that provide me with the most realistic sond, no colorations, no softines when there is mone, bad recordings will always be a bad recording with the Dynaudio X12, ao good recordind will sound superb! For me that is a neutral speaker and a accurate speaker.
plastic penguin said:BigH said:Well the demo is over, I did not like the Dyn X12s. They were detailed yes but they were cool side of neatral but the treble was very forward, you noticed it on every recording also strings to me did not sound natural. I found them similar to the PMC DB1s. So sorry to me they were not very musical, disappointing. Music I played was 70s rock, 50/60s jazz, classical,and female/male vocals.
I also heard some Tannoys 6.1s were were the opposite I suppose, warm but a bit woolly in the bass department.
Could it be the acoustics of the room is naff? Think you'll need to hear those Dyns in your own room before catagorically dismissing them. From how you described those bears no relation to my experience of Dyns, unless they have changed the signature dramatically.
Wolf75 said:That's strange, I have dyn x12 as well, and it never sounded forward or harsh to me, just smooth and silky, but very detailed at the same time. I really like its treble.
Wolf75 said:That's strange, I have dyn x12 as well, and it never sounded forward or harsh to me, just smooth and silky, but very detailed at the same time. I really like its treble.
BigH said:Hi-FiOutlaw said:Thats why there are so many speakers on the market, all of the with diferent accoustic signature, for me the Dyns are the speakers that provide me with the most realistic sond, no colorations, no softines when there is mone, bad recordings will always be a bad recording with the Dynaudio X12, ao good recordind will sound superb! For me that is a neutral speaker and a accurate speaker.
Thats fine but I could not live with the treble esp. drum cymbals they got on my nerves even after a short listen thats why I liked the AVIs they were neutral and accurate to my ears. Maybe your Rega set up tones that down?