• If you ever spot Spam (either in the forums, or received via forum direct message) please use the Report button at the bottom of each post to make sure a Moderator can handle it quickly. Thanks for your help in keeping things running smoothly!

LG OLED48CX

lou garou

Member
Jul 20, 2020
1
0
20
"In the UK, the OLED48CX is available either as the OLED48CX6LA or OLED48CX5LB. The only difference is the finish: the 6LA comes in dark silver, while the 5LB is light silver."
Currys are advertising this as the LG OLED48CX6LB. Would that be a mid-silver?
 

Renfrew

Member
Jul 20, 2020
1
0
20
I've read several times that 4K below 50" screens is a waste of money.
One just can't see a significant difference, yet when a 65" or larger screen is watched then one can appreciate the 4K. Another thing is that 8K is the next big seller and I've seen an 82" on display at a local Sam's Club. All I can say that this will be the near future with a possible resurrection of 3D down the road, a road not yet paved however. 8K programming is still far away. The manufacturers need to motivate us to buy so they are working hard to get our money.
 

Geoff-W

Member
May 15, 2020
1
0
20
I was very surprised and disappointed to read that this TV does not support the standard suite of catch-up apps. As far as I'm concerned this would be a show stopper. I cannot comprehend any manufacturer these days, introducing a new model without this facility. The review made no mention of any intention by LG to correct this error via a future software update.
 

NHK

Member
Jul 23, 2020
2
0
20
I've read several times that 4K below 50" screens is a waste of money.
One just can't see a significant difference
4K is just pixel resolution, and yes beyond a certain viewing distance a smaller screen may not yield much improvement here over HD. But HDR and dynamic metadata (which are common in 4K formats like DV etc) mean smaller sized 4k screens still produce a picture with a deeper and more realistic contrast ratio than a similarly sized HD screen. You could argue in fact that a smaller screen’s increased pixel density gives it the advantage here over biggerTVs.
 

NHK

Member
Jul 23, 2020
2
0
20
In case this helps anyone considering this TV- I returned my CX48 after a couple of weeks for a refund. I seem to be highly aware of motion processing and even with it all turned off, live action motion felt artificial and ‘electronic’ rather than natural and ‘optical’.

I then tried a Sony 55” A8 in-store with all motion processing off and motion was rougher with panning shots but more natural overall. This suggests LG in their wisdom don’t let you defeat as much motion processing as Sony and What Hi Fi do give Sony the edge here. The effect for me was so bad with the LG I was ‘seeing’ the acting, the magic had gone. YMMV

Reverting to my 2005 43” Pioneer plasma was a relief and I didn’t miss the LG other than its HDR and true blacks. . However the picture is so photographic with the plasma that I soon forget and just enjoy the content.

Now awaiting Sony’s 48” A9 which drops soon.
 

Dave Gypsum

Member
Mar 27, 2020
2
0
20
I was very surprised and disappointed to read that this TV does not support the standard suite of catch-up apps. As far as I'm concerned this would be a show stopper. I cannot comprehend any manufacturer these days, introducing a new model without this facility. The review made no mention of any intention by LG to correct this error via a future software update.
If you want a top quality TV below 50 inches - which I do - the necessity to buy a £50 Fire stick or a Roku to go with it is hardly a show stopper - even if I didn't have one already.
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts