June 09 Mag

[DjP]

Hi,

My copy of the latest edition has no p114, instead it has p116 reprinted. Slightly annoying bc that's where the speaker comparison I was looking for should be...

Am I special, or is this a universal SNAFU?

DjP

 

[Wightknight]

Mine too.

Send the proof reader to bed without any tea!

 

[JoelSim]

Probably the printer's fault rather than the proof reader.

ÿ

 

[VoodooDoctor]

Mine too.

 

[Andy Clough]

Yup, last minute problem at the printers I'm afraid. We're aware of it, but nothing we can do at this stage. Apologies.

 

[Cofnchtr]

Hi,

If this magazine is kept - will it become a 'rarity' because of the mistake.

Recall all of them and reprint another run - these will be '1st edition'. Lol.

Cheers,

Cofnchtr.

 

[VoodooDoctor]

Make the missing page available as a PDF on the website?

 

[DjP]

Any chance of a PDF of page 114? Not crucial bc the info is mostly repeated from previous months, but it would be useful...

DjP

 

[plastic penguin]

Damn good read though. As an Arcam fan, I'm please to see they're back on the money with the new tuner.

I shall have a good read a little later.

 

[Andy Clough]

All the reviews from the missing page 114 (ie: style speaker packages and conventional speaker packages) can still be found here on the site, and you can use the filters in the Reviews section to choose the price band you require, star rating etc.

Hope that helps.