- Mar 3, 2010
- 690
- 9
- 0
Afternoon guys, I’m needing a bit of advice.
I’m looking to spend about £300 on a fresh CD player to replace my relic Technics SL-P777 that I’ve owned now for nearly 22 years!
Thing is I’m not sure what would get me a better player for that price: new or used? The continual drift away from physical media means £600-700 players from a few years ago are within my price-range now, as they become less sought-after on the used market. But will they still comfortably beat today’s £300 new players, or has technology really not advanced that much?
To give a case in point, a year or so ago my dad bought a NAD C515BEE: very highly rated at its £250 price point. Compared to my ancient Technics it sounds more refined and smooth but it doesn’t have nearly the resolving power. Basically you hear more stuff going on with the Technics, though it doesn’t present it in as sophisticated a fashion: the SLP-777 sounds more ‘digital’. But it was a decent midrange player in its day (22 years ago, £350 wasn’t cheap) and that’s reflected in its resolving power.
I’ve been looking at mid-90s favourites such as the Marantz CD63 mkII KI. I’ve never heard it but the press went mad on this player when it was launched and at the time I assumed it would be much better than my Technics, but I couldn’t afford it. Nowadays it easily falls within my price bracket, but internet opinion seems to be very polarised about it.
I don’t just want something different, I want something definitely better in terms of resolution, presentation and overall musical refinement. Surely a more modern player now worth £300 either new or used should wipe the floor with my old Technics?
Thankyou for your time.
I’m looking to spend about £300 on a fresh CD player to replace my relic Technics SL-P777 that I’ve owned now for nearly 22 years!
Thing is I’m not sure what would get me a better player for that price: new or used? The continual drift away from physical media means £600-700 players from a few years ago are within my price-range now, as they become less sought-after on the used market. But will they still comfortably beat today’s £300 new players, or has technology really not advanced that much?
To give a case in point, a year or so ago my dad bought a NAD C515BEE: very highly rated at its £250 price point. Compared to my ancient Technics it sounds more refined and smooth but it doesn’t have nearly the resolving power. Basically you hear more stuff going on with the Technics, though it doesn’t present it in as sophisticated a fashion: the SLP-777 sounds more ‘digital’. But it was a decent midrange player in its day (22 years ago, £350 wasn’t cheap) and that’s reflected in its resolving power.
I’ve been looking at mid-90s favourites such as the Marantz CD63 mkII KI. I’ve never heard it but the press went mad on this player when it was launched and at the time I assumed it would be much better than my Technics, but I couldn’t afford it. Nowadays it easily falls within my price bracket, but internet opinion seems to be very polarised about it.
I don’t just want something different, I want something definitely better in terms of resolution, presentation and overall musical refinement. Surely a more modern player now worth £300 either new or used should wipe the floor with my old Technics?
Thankyou for your time.