Pistol Pete1 said:Yes they will......(ducking for cover!!!!!) :help:
eggontoast said:Oh no, here we go again. Would probably be easier just to try a few to make up your own mind.
MCRetina said:Maybe for the next topic I sould ask something less controversial ........... abortion, religion maybe?
You should be OK with them subjects......and politics of course.MCRetina said:Maybe for the next topic I sould ask something less controversial ........... abortion, religion maybe?
tino said:No they don't .. they just degrade the audio less.
MCRetina said:Maybe for the next topic I sould ask something less controversial ........... abortion, religion maybe?
bigboss said:Here's my recent experience with RCA cables.
I wanted one for my bedroom to connect my Sonos to Audioengine 2 speakers. There was a lot of static noise when I first tried a cheap £2.69 cable (I had not even begun to check audio quality). I contacted the ebay seller, who sent another one out. Same result. I then ordered a £16 cable which was better built. No static noise this time.
I concur, I replaced a pair of rca cables with more expensive ones and noticed that the interference caused by my mobile phone was gone. I do think that with a revealing setup cables might make a difference, but I do not own one. I can confidently say that a better built cable reduces interference.
In a nutshell, I can't comment if there's an improvement in sound, but better built RCA cables definitely eliminate static. Of course, my view about HDMI cables are well known; I haven't noticed a difference.
I'm still waiting for Audioquest (or Monster) to introduce an aerosol spray that will improve the sound quality of wireless streaming...hammill said:Try suggesting one hard disk sounds better than another. That is even more fun.
tremon said:I'm still waiting for Audioquest (or Monster) to introduce an aerosol spray that will improve the sound quality of wireless streaming...hammill said:Try suggesting one hard disk sounds better than another. That is even more fun.