During past few months I've been consistently reading reviews of all the TVs in WHFSV mag and have been surprised at the content and tests (well not much technical details on tests are shared) written.
I've been annoyed by the fact that all these reviews focus on just how well the TV displays the HD contents, while in reality my guess is 90% of general populations still using SD sources and terrestrial TV.
Why is WHFSV editors are keeping their eyes closed on this fact that majority of the reviewers want to know how well the TV displays SD contents. You can see that lot of these poor readers buy the TV based on the review and star ratings and pretty disappointed to see artefact's & big square blocks all over their faces.
My humble request to WHFSV editors is to divide each review of TV into two section how well TV performs displaying HD contents and how well it is able to display/upscale SD contents. This will help majority of buyers to decide which TV to go for.
I've been annoyed by the fact that all these reviews focus on just how well the TV displays the HD contents, while in reality my guess is 90% of general populations still using SD sources and terrestrial TV.
Why is WHFSV editors are keeping their eyes closed on this fact that majority of the reviewers want to know how well the TV displays SD contents. You can see that lot of these poor readers buy the TV based on the review and star ratings and pretty disappointed to see artefact's & big square blocks all over their faces.
My humble request to WHFSV editors is to divide each review of TV into two section how well TV performs displaying HD contents and how well it is able to display/upscale SD contents. This will help majority of buyers to decide which TV to go for.