Recent content by Flatearth50

  1. F

    Devialet 170 vs Devialet 240

    My analogue source is more natural and organic sounding than any digital source that I've heard IMO. It is also less fatiguing over long listening sessions. However the Devialet makes a persuasive case for digital and it's strengths. It drove the Obelisk 2 very well and sounded very clear and...
  2. F

    Devialet 170 vs Devialet 240

    My analogue source is more natural and organic sounding than any digital source that I've heard IMO. It also is less fatiguing over long listening sessions. However the Devialet makes a persuasive case for digital and it's strengths. It drove the Obelisk 2 very well and sounded very clear and...
  3. F

    Devialet 170 vs Devialet 240

    Just dem'd a Mac Pro feeding ripped CDs into a 170 driving a pair of Shahinain Obelisk mk2. The usual digital processed effect was there but for anyone without a large vinyl collection/ turntable and CD collection/ player IMO it's a viable option. Shahinians are notoriously difficuilt to drive...
  4. F

    Devialet 170 vs Devialet 240

    Just dem'd a Mac Pro feeding ripped CDs into a 170 driving a pair of Shahinain Obelisk mk2. The usual digital processed effect was there but for anyone without a large vinyl collection/ turntable and CD collection/ player IMO it's a viable option. Shahinians are notoriously difficuilt to drive...